
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LEXJURIS
Respondant Advocate MR.BALWAINDER S.KALSI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 614 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 06/02/2017 in Complaint No. 725/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED10, LOCAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, KALKAJI,...
Case Number: 614
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anil Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
It is stated by Sh.Munish Gupta, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties that to discharge the entire liability, the Opposite Parties shall pay an amount of Rs.1,75,000/- through a bank draft in the name of the complainants on or before 31.03.2018. The offer made is acceptabl...
Case Number: 306
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Kuthiala, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained fo...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NITIN GARG
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing: 20.02.2018 Date of Decision:23.02.2018COMPLAINT NO-2054/2017IN THE MATTER OF: Jasbir Mathur H.No: 1020, Dana Bhatpura, V.P.O Karala, Delhi-110081 ….Complainant...
Case Number: 2054
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/76/2016Date of Institution:03/02/2016Date of Decision:06/02/2018Sanjeev Dewan, resident of H.No. 1129, Sector 11, Panchkula.…..ComplainantV E R S U SM/s OMAXE Chandigarh Extensio...
Case Number: 76
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Geeta Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
The matter has amicably been settled between the parties. Sh. Munish Gupta, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party states that amount of Rs.9 Lacs will be paid in two equated installments of Rs.4.50 Lacs each, through post-dated cheques, encashable on or before 15.03.2018 and 3...
Case Number: 455
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2018
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amitabh Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party raised a very serious objection qua maintainability of this complaint stating that as on today, the total value of the product and the relief claimed would come beyond Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel for t...
Case Number: 692
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, proxy Counsel for Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties raised a very serious objection that as on today, the total value of the product and the relief claimed would come beyond Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel f...
Case Number: 525
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim aggarwal, Adv.
Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties raised a very serious objection that as on today, the total value of the product and the relief claimed would come beyond Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this compl...
Case Number: 643
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim aggarwal, Adv.
As per office report, rejoinder filed by the complainant in the office, which is taken on record. Copy has already been supplied to the Counsel opposite. It is stated by Sh.Sandeep Bhardwaj, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant on getting telephonic instructions from the complai...
Case Number: 515
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.