M2k
Latest Judgments
Total 77 Consumer Court Cases Against M2k.
M/S. M2K Infrastructure V/S Jai Bhagwan Sharma
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC/529/14 Dated:In the matter of: M/S Surender Kumar Sharma S/O Sh. Parmanand Sharm...
Case Number: 531
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2016
M/S. M2K Infrastructure V/S Sunita Devi
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC/529/14 Dated:In the matter of: M/S Surender Kumar Sharma S/O Sh. Parmanand Sharm...
Case Number: 532
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2016
M/S. M2K Infrastructure V/S Daya Nand Sharma
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC/529/14 Dated:In the matter of: M/S Surender Kumar Sharma S/O Sh. Parmanand Sharm...
Case Number: 533
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2016
M/S. M2K Infrastructure V/S Sunita Devi
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC/529/14 Dated:In the matter of: M/S Surender Kumar Sharma S/O Sh. Parmanand Sharm...
Case Number: 534
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2016
M2K INFRASTRUCTURE V/S SUDHA YADAV
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.S.BADHRAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No.60 of 2016 Date of Institution: 09.03.2016 Date of Decision: 07.04.20161. Sudha Yadav D/o Sh.R.C.Yadav,2. Ritesh Parkash Yadav son of Sudha Yadav, Both resident of House NO.2064, Sector 4 Urban Estate...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2016
M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. V/S LINKY SAXENA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986Complaint Case No. CC/293/20141. LINKY SAXENAD-604, PARK VIEW CITY-II SOHNA ROAD, SEC-49, GURGAON-122018............Complainant(s)Versus1. M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.E-13/29, HARSHA BHAW...
Case Number: 293
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-09-2015
ANJU SINGH V/S M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 29.07.2015 First Appeal- 205/2013(Arising out of the order dated 04.12.2012 passed in Complainant Case No. 499/2009 by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-VI (Dist...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2015
KAVINDER KINHA AND ANOTHER V/S M2K INFRASTRCTURE PVT.LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate JAINAINDER SAINI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 77 of 2015Date of Institution: 21.01.2015Date of Decision : 09.04.2015M/s M2K Infrastructure Private Limited (through Manager) E-13/29, Harsha Bhawan, Cannaught Place, New Delhi-110001. Appellant-Op...
Case Number: 77
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2015
M/s M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., V/S Smt. MANDEEP KAUR,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY KUMAR CHOPRA & MS. SHELLY JAIN,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 323 OF 2013 WITH IA/6419/20131. Smt. MANDEEP KAUR,W/o Shri Sanjay Sharma, H-105, G.F., Residency Greens, Greenwood City, Sector-46,GURGAON - 122001............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s M2K INFRASTRUCTURE...
Case Number: 323
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2013
RAJESH KUMAR V/S M2K COUNTRY HEIGHTS & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ROHIT SHARMA & MR. AMARJEET SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2810 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 11/10/2012 in Appeal No. 615/2011 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/4826/2013,IA/4827/2013,IA/4828/20131. M2K COUNTRY HEIGHTS & ANR.E-13/29 HARSHA BHAWAN, C...
Case Number: 2810
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against M2k in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against M2k ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against M2k under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.