M2k
Latest Judgments
Total 77 Consumer Court Cases Against M2k.
M/S M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. V/S JAMES SEBASTIAN
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ROHIT GOSWAMI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 279
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2022
M/S. ADANI M2K PROJECTS LLP V/S ANKUR SHARMA & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DIWAKER CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. SURINDER SINGH & MR. AMIT AGARWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 317 OF 20181. ANKUR SHARMA & ANR............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. ADANI M2K PROJECTS LLPthrough its Director/s Ground Floor, adani, House, Plot no. 83, Sec.32, Institutional Area, GURUGRAM-122001HARY...
Case Number: 317
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2022
M/S M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. V/S USHA RANI
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ASHWANT KR SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1087
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2021
Adani M2K Project LLP V/S T M Sabu
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Sh. Gaurav Vashisht
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 176
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2020
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2021
ADANI M2K PROJECT LLP & ORS. V/S AEROSTAR HELMETS PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY KUMAR TANDON
Respondant Advocate MR. SURINDER SINGH & MR. AMIT AGARWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 930 OF 20181. AEROSTAR HELMETS PVT. LTD.R/o 501, basti harpool singh, sadar Bazar,New Delhi - 110006...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ADANI M2K PROJECT LLP & ORS.R/o 10th floor, Shikhar, near Adani House, ...
Case Number: 930
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2020
DR. KANIKA V/S M2K INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/84/2015( Date of Filing : 13 Feb 2015 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. 585/2012 of District New Delhi)1. M2K INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. E-3/29, HARSHA BHAWAN, CONNAUGHT...
Case Number: 84
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2020
UJJAWAL KUMAR & 4 ORS. V/S M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ROHIT SHARMA & MR. AMARJEET SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. SHARAN SETHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 686 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 19/08/2013 in Complaint No. 49/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.E-13/29, HARSHA BHAWAN, CONNAUGHT CIRCUS, NEW DELHI-110001...........Ap...
Case Number: 686
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2019
M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. V/S JAGBIR SINGH YADAV
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ANOOP KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments : 07.05.2019Date of Decision : 17.05.2019 COMPLAINT NO.898/2017In the matter of:Shri Jagbir Singh YadavVillage Garhi, P.O. Garhibolni,Distt. Riwari, Haryana…&he...
Case Number: 898
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2019
M/S M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. V/S SUSHIL LEGA AND ANTOHER
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RANJAN LOHAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. 201 of 2018Date of Institution: 28.03.2018Date of Decision: 04.10.20181. Sushil Lega son of Shri Ram Partap, resident of House No.15-1, Jwahar Nagar, Hisar, Haryana.2. Sunita Lega wife of Sushil Lega, ...
Case Number: 201
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2018
M/S. M2K Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. V/S Dr. Ravi K.Dhar
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC- 675/2011 Dated: 05/06/2018 The OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat/plot and relief claimed exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs, as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to...
Case Number: 675
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 05-06-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against M2k in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against M2k ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against M2k under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.