M2k
Latest Judgments
Total 77 Consumer Court Cases Against M2k.
M/S. M2K Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. V/S Krishan Pal
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110001Ex. No./64/2014 Dated:In the matter of:Dr. Krishan Pal,S/o Sh. Balbir Singh,R/o Villag...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2018
M/S. M2K Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. V/S Ved Prakash Yadav
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110001Ex. No./63/2014 Dated:In the matter of:Mr.Ved Prakash,S/o Sh. Om Prakash,R/o Village Chandu,P.O...
Case Number: 63
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2018
M/S. M2K Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. V/S Rishi sharma
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110001Ex. No./62/2014 Dated:In the matter of:Mr. Rishi SharmaS/o Sh. Vikram SharmaR/o H.No. 1347, ...
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2018
M/S. M2K Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. V/S Sheenu Gupta
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Q
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110001Ex. No./61/2014 Dated:In the matter of:Ms. Sheenu Gupta,D/o Sh. K.C. Gupta,R/o 807/5, Gali No.4...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2018
M/S. M2K Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. V/S Chandu Parihar
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC-183/2015 Dated: 18/05/2018 O R D E RThe OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the subject matter of the dispute isRs.21,30,375/-. Hence, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to enterta...
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2018
M/S. M2K Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. V/S Ajay Yadav
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
C.C. No.82/2013 Dated: 01/05/2018 ORDERThe OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat/plot exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs i.e. Rs.25,83,375/- as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to...
Case Number: 82
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2018
M/S. M2K Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. V/S Mahesh Yadav
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC-468/2011 Dated: 16/04/2018 The OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat/plot exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs i.e. Rs. 27,06,875/-, as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction...
Case Number: 468
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2018
DEEPTI @ MEGHA GUPTA & ANR. V/S M/S. M2K DEVELOPERS (P) LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH & MR. BIDIT KUMAR DEKA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 127 OF 2018 IN FA/730/20131. M/S. M2K DEVELOPERS (P) LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. DEEPTI @ MEGHA GUPTA & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN,PRESIDEN...
Case Number: 127
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2018
M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. V/S KAPIL SHARMA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LAW INTELLECT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 3103 OF 20171. KAPIL SHARMAS/O LATE SH G L SHARMA 33, CHARILES CRESCENT HARROW HA1 4AR,GREATER LONDONUNITED KINGDOM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR REGD. O...
Case Number: 3103
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2017
M2K Infrastructure Pvt. V/S Rohtash
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh.Bikram Singh Chauhan
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 284
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against M2k in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against M2k ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against M2k under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.