M2k
Latest Judgments
Total 77 Consumer Court Cases Against M2k.
M2K Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ritesh Prakash Yadav
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh. Lalit Kalra
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 191
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2017
M2K Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V/S Rajpal Yadav
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rao Rishal Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 181
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2017
BIMLA MALIK V/S M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate JAINAINDER SAINI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 1234 of 2016Date of Institution: 19.12.2016Date of Decision : 08.08.20171. M/s M2K Infrastructure Private Limited, E-13-29, Harsha Bhawan, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001 through its Authorized Si...
Case Number: 1234
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-09-2017
PAWAN RANA & ANR. V/S M/S. M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ROHIT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate EX-PARTE (R-1 & 2)
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3251 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/06/2011 in Appeal No. 778/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.E-13/29,1st Floor, Harsha Bhawan, Cannought Circus, New Delhi ...
Case Number: 3252
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2017
MANISH KUMAR SRIVASTAV & ANR. V/S M/S. M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ROHIT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MS. RENU KUHAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3251 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/06/2011 in Appeal No. 778/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.E-13/29,1st Floor, Harsha Bhawan, Cannought Circus, New Delhi ...
Case Number: 3251
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2017
M2K INFRATSTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. V/S OM PRAKASH GUPTA & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHIM SHRIDHAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1245 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 13/05/2016 in Complaint No. 417/2014 of the State Commission Delhi)1. OM PRAKASH GUPTA & ANR.S/O. LATE SHRI R.K GUTA , R/O. HOUSE NO 13 NEW R BLOCK OPP CHIJJU RAM SHOPTI...
Case Number: 1245
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2017
MEENAKSHI YADAV V/S M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate JAINAINDER SAINI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 1073 of 2016Date of Institution: 08.11.2016Date of Decision: 19.12.20161. M/s M2K Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (through Manager) E-13/29, Harsha Bhawan, Connaught Place, New Delhi, 110001 through its Au...
Case Number: 1073
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2017
BHARAT RAJ V/S M2K INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate JAINAINDER SAINI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 1074 of 2016Date of Institution: 08.11.2016Date of Decision: 19.12.20161. M/s M2K Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (through Manager) E-13/29, Harsha Bhawan, Connaught Place, New Delhi, 110001 through its Au...
Case Number: 1074
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2017
JOGINDER SINGH V/S M2K COUNTRY HEIGHTS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate JAINAINDER SAINI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 1075 of 2016Date of Institution: 08.11.2016Date of Decision: 19.12.2016M/s M2K Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (through Manager) E-13/29, Harsha Bhawan, Connaught Place, New Delhi, 110001 through its Autho...
Case Number: 1075
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2017
M2K Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V/S Bimla Malik
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rupender Sheoran
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 242
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against M2k in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against M2k ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against M2k under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.