company-name-logo

Delhi Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 327 Consumer Court Cases Against Delhi Development Authority.

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SUBODH KUMAR BAHETI

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. VIKAS JAIN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 501 OF 2012 IN RP/2335/20121. SUBODH KUMAR BAHETI...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRE...

Case Number: 501

|

Date of Filing: 31-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2012

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ARUNA KHANDELWAL

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. YATEENDRA SINGH JAFA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4088 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 27/07/2011 in Appeal No. 786/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ARUNA KHANDELWALC/o Shri R.K Khadelwal IPS (Retd) B-4 Triveni Apartments,Sheikh SaraiNew Delhi -1...

Case Number: 4088

|

Date of Filing: 14-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 26-10-2012

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHARDA KAURA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. KAMINI SHARMA

Respondant Advocate MR. O.P. SHARDA & MS. MANIKA TRIPATHY PANDEY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 417 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 01/09/2006 in Complaint No. 214/1996 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHARDA KAURAHOUSE NO 55 SECTOR 9 PUNCHKULA HARYANA PUNCHKULA HARYANA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DELHI ...

Case Number: 417

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2007

|

Date of Upload: 25-09-2012

NCDRC

JAGDISH CHANDER LUTHRA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate MR. Y.R. GROVER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 335 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 27/03/2009 in Complaint No. 166/1998 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVikas Sadan, INANew Delhi...........Appellant(s)Versus1. JAGDISH CHANDER ...

Case Number: 335

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2009

|

Date of Upload: 25-09-2012

NCDRC

M/S. ANAND ESTATE PRIVATE LTD. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 04/07/2006 in Complaint No. 279/1995 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA NEW DELHI -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S. ANAND ESTATE ...

Case Number: 442

|

Date of Filing: 28-08-2006

|

Date of Upload: 06-08-2012

NCDRC

M/S. EXPRESS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority   Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 443 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 04/07/2006 in Complaint No. 16/1996 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA NEW DELHI -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S. EXPRESS PROPER...

Case Number: 443

|

Date of Filing: 28-08-2006

|

Date of Upload: 06-08-2012

NCDRC

VIJAY BALA KAPOOR V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate MR. VIBHU TIWARI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1549 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/01/2012 in Appeal No. 576/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVikas Sadan,INA,New DelhiDelhi...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. VIJAY B...

Case Number: 1549

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 21-05-2012

NCDRC

SHRI VIMAL KAPOOR AND ORS. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL

Respondant Advocate MR. S.K. KAPOOR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 511 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 23/05/2006 in Complaint No. 75/1995 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA NEW DELHI -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SHRI VIMAL KAPOOR A...

Case Number: 511

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2006

|

Date of Upload: 10-05-2012

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S GROUP CAPTAIN HARJAS SINGH BAINS

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2012 IN RP/2568/20071. GROUP CAPTAIN HARJAS SINGH BAINS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. B. GUPTA, PRESIDIN...

Case Number: 72

|

Date of Filing: 23-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2012

NCDRC

JAGDISH LAL ARORA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate MR. SANJAY JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 93 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 31/10/2007 in Appeal No. 763/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. JAGDISH LA...

Case Number: 93

|

Date of Filing: 08-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Delhi Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Delhi Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Delhi Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.