company-name-logo

Delhi Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 327 Consumer Court Cases Against Delhi Development Authority.

NCDRC

M/S. AAR PEE APARTMENT V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 543 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 15/10/2012 in Appeal No. 880/2009 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/971/2013,IA/972/20131. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYEXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VIKAS SADAN , INANEW ...

Case Number: 543

|

Date of Filing: 12-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 11-03-2013

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD COOP. GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority   Society  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. TRIPAT SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. P.K. AGGARWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2013 IN FA/280/20051. UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD COOP. GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ...

Case Number: 32

|

Date of Filing: 20-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 26-03-2013

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S UMESH GUPTA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MAHAJAN AND ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MS. GIRIJA WADHWA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3899 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 27/10/2006 in Appeal No. 639/1996 of the State Commission Delhi)1. UMESH GUPTAS/O. SHRI , H. R. GUPTA . R/O. A-2. DAYANADA VIHAR , VIKAS MARG, EXTIENSION DELHI -11...

Case Number: 3899

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2006

|

Date of Upload: 25-06-2013

NCDRC

RAM NIWAS GUPTA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate MR. PRAKASH ARYA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4006 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 18/07/2007 in Appeal No. 387/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. RAM NIW...

Case Number: 4006

|

Date of Filing: 30-11-2007

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2013

NCDRC

RAJESH TIWARI V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate M/S. R.K. PATRA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4466 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/07/2012 in Appeal No. 366/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVikas Sadan, NEW DELHI...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. RAJESH TIWARIS/...

Case Number: 4466

|

Date of Filing: 26-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-03-2013

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ASHA SHANKAR

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. K.P. SUNDER RAO & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MS. ARTI BANSAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 15/09/2010 in Complaint No. 108/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ASHA SHANKARW/O :SH.PRATAP SHANKAR R/O:R-734,NEW RAJINDER NAGAR NEW DELHI -110060...........Appellant...

Case Number: 25

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 14-01-2013

NCDRC

NEERAJ KUMAR V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 726 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 15/10/2012 in Complaint No. 68/2008 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR (H-I), VIKAS SADAN, I.N.A, NEW DELHI...........Appell...

Case Number: 726

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 12-12-2012

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHIV NARAIN GUPTA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY PAUL

Respondant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1656 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 26/05/2011 in Appeal No. 393/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHIV NARAIN GUPTAS/o Late Sh Ram Chander Gupta B-161 Serctor- 26Noida - 201301U.P...........Petit...

Case Number: 1656

|

Date of Filing: 23-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-11-2012

NCDRC

K.K. KHANNA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 56 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 15/09/2006 in Complaint No. 190/1996 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, RL VIKAS SADAN, INA NEW DELHI...........Appellant(s)Versus...

Case Number: 56

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2007

|

Date of Upload: 04-10-2012

NCDRC

KHALID HASHMI V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3312 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 06/08/2012 in Appeal No. 494/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYD Block,2nd Floor, Self Fiancing Scheme Vikas Sadan, INANew Delhi- 110...

Case Number: 3312

|

Date of Filing: 05-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 24-09-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Delhi Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Delhi Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Delhi Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.