company-name-logo

Delhi Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 327 Consumer Court Cases Against Delhi Development Authority.

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PRADEEP GAMBHIR & ANR.

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. NAVDEEP SINGH & MR. M.S. KAPOOR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2521 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 10/03/2014 in Appeal No. 712/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. PRADEEP GAMBHIR & ANR.S/O SH.DHARAMBIR GAMBHIR, R/O W-115 GREATER KAILASH-IINEW DELHI 2. SH.SANDE...

Case Number: 2521

|

Date of Filing: 11-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2014

NCDRC

R.K. BHILWARIA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2231 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 31/03/2014 in Appeal No. 1013/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/3332/20141. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI...........Petitioner(s...

Case Number: 2231

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-06-2014

NCDRC

SHEELA AGGARWAL V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 937 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 03/09/2013 in Appeal No. 276/2010 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/684/20141. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INANEW DELHI...........Petitioner(s)Vers...

Case Number: 937

|

Date of Filing: 30-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-06-2014

NCDRC

RAJENDER PRASAD AND ORS. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate MR. NIRAJ SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1262-1314 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 19/12/2007 in Appeal No. 981/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. RA...

Case Number: 1262

|

Date of Filing: 28-03-2008

|

Date of Upload: 11-06-2014

NCDRC

CHANCHAL KUMAR V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3095 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 14/05/2013 in Appeal No. 265/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYINA,VIKAS SADAN.NEW DELHI ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. CHANCHAL KU...

Case Number: 3095

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 11-06-2014

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S HOLTECH COOP G.H. SOCIETY LTD.

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority   Society  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. TRIPAT SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 459 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 19/02/2013 in Complaint No. 324/2002 of the State Commission Delhi)1. HOLTECH COOP G.H. SOCIETY LTD.Plot No.2,Sector-9, Dwarka, New Delhi-110 075...........Appellant(s)Ve...

Case Number: 459

|

Date of Filing: 17-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2014

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MR JOGINDER SINGH

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/86/2012( Date of Filing : 02 Feb 2012 )1. MR JOGINDER SINGH R/O S-122 VENUS APARTMENT SECTOR-9 ROHINI DELHI 110085...........Complainant(s...

Case Number: 86

|

Date of Filing: 02-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 11-09-2018

NCDRC

USHA KIRAN V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 926 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 22/10/2013 in Appeal No. 1039/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/643/20141. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN INA NEW DELHI...........Petitioner(s)Ver...

Case Number: 926

|

Date of Filing: 29-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 13-03-2014

NCDRC

PADMA JAIN V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4872 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/08/2012 in Appeal No. 01/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Director (H-1) Vikas Sadan, I.N.A.NEW DELHI...........Petit...

Case Number: 4872

|

Date of Filing: 21-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2014

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S CAPT. SURINDER KUMAR SHARMA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2014 IN RP/3323/20131. CAPT. SURINDER KUMAR SHARMA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMB...

Case Number: 33

|

Date of Filing: 26-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Delhi Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Delhi Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Delhi Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.