company-name-logo

Delhi Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 327 Consumer Court Cases Against Delhi Development Authority.

NCDRC

VICE -CHAIRMAN, DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (DDA) V/S MS. IQBAL KAUR

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 298 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 09/05/2008 in Complaint No. C-311/2002 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MS. IQBAL KAURC-66, Malviya Nagar,New Delhi - 110 017Delhi...........Appellant(s)Versus1. VICE -CH...

Case Number: 298

|

Date of Filing: 10-07-2008

|

Date of Upload: 28-10-2013

NCDRC

MS IQBAL KAUR V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 298 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 09/05/2008 in Complaint No. C-311/2002 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MS. IQBAL KAURC-66, Malviya Nagar,New Delhi - 110 017Delhi...........Appellant(s)Versus1. VICE -CH...

Case Number: 392

|

Date of Filing: 22-09-2008

|

Date of Upload: 28-10-2013

NCDRC

DINESH KUMAR GUPTA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4339 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 28/08/2012 in Appeal No. 691/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Director, Vikas Sadan I.N.A NEW DELHi - 110023...........P...

Case Number: 4339

|

Date of Filing: 12-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 09-09-2013

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ANIL KUMAR JAIN & ANR.

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ISHAAN MADAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 121 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 18/12/2012 in Complaint No. 193/2006 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ANIL KUMAR JAIN & ANR.R/O. 30, POCKET-I, JASOLA, NEW DELHI-1100252. RASHMI JIN R/O. 30, POCKET-I, JA...

Case Number: 121

|

Date of Filing: 08-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 27-08-2013

NCDRC

SURINDER SINGH V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3791 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/07/2012 in Appeal No. 196/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough Vice Chairman, Vikas Sadan, I.N.A. Market,New Delhi-110023Delh...

Case Number: 3791

|

Date of Filing: 04-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 29-05-2013

NCDRC

VEENA TAMTA BHATIA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. MANIKA TRIPATHY PANDEY

Respondant Advocate MR. MANOJ SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 109 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 26/09/2008 in Complaint No. 219/2000 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTharogh Its Director, H-II Vikas Sadan -I.N.I New Delhi Delhi ..............

Case Number: 109

|

Date of Filing: 23-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 12-06-2013

NCDRC

VAS DEV V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 22/08/2008 in Complaint No. 55/2000 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Chiarman , Vikas Sadan ,New DelhiDelhi ...........Appellan...

Case Number: 44

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2009

|

Date of Upload: 08-05-2013

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ASHOK KUMAR SAINIA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. B.D.SAINIA

Respondant Advocate MS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 203 OF 2013 IN FA/183/20071. ASHOK KUMAR SAINIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. V...

Case Number: 203

|

Date of Filing: 25-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 19-06-2013

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ASHOK KUMAR SAINIA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. B.D.SAINIA

Respondant Advocate MS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 183 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 02/02/2007 in Complaint No. 95/1998 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ASHOK KUMAR SAINIA11665/1, SAT NAGAR, KAROL BAGH NEW DELHI - 110005...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DELHI DE...

Case Number: 183

|

Date of Filing: 20-03-2007

|

Date of Upload: 21-03-2013

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S D.S. SAGI

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2002 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/03/2012 in Appeal No. 651/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. D.S. SAGIR/o Kothi No-98,Phase-VII, SAS nagar MohaliPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DELHI ...

Case Number: 2002

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-03-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Delhi Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Delhi Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Delhi Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.