
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIUDYOG SADAN, C-22 & 23, QUTUB INSTITUTIONAL AREA(BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL) : NEW DELHI – 110016. Case No. 1044/07M/s Map Auto Ltd.,Through its Managing DirectorShri Yashpal Gupta,Resident of 53, Triveni Apartments,A-6, Paschim Vihar,New Del...
Case Number: 1044
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2015
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority Education Society
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASUTOSH LOHIA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2152 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 27/01/2014 in Appeal No. 704/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BHAGWAN EDUCATION SOCIETYPLOT NO-5, AG BLOCK, SHALIMAR BAGH, THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, SMT. ...
Case Number: 2152
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2014
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AZHAR QAYUM BUTT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3286 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 31/03/2014 in Appeal No. 332/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH VICE- CHAIRMAN VIKAS SADAN , INANEW DELHI- 110023...........Pe...
Case Number: 3286
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2014
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AZHAR QAYUM BUTT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3250 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 19/05/2014 in Appeal No. 431/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN INA,NEW DELHI...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. V P DHALL & ...
Case Number: 3250
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2014
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. GIRIJA WADHWA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3168 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 01/05/2014 in Appeal No. 630/2013 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INANEW DELHIDELHI...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. GEETA K...
Case Number: 3168
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 03-09-2014
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 710 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 25/10/2013 in Appeal No. 569/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, (H-1) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VIKAS SADAN, I...
Case Number: 710
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2014
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAV
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 20/12/2013 in Complaint No. 263/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DR. VIJAY KUMAR GUPTAS/O. LATE KHEM CHAND GUPTA, R/O. HX-62, KITYANI, MANDSAUR, MADHTA PRADESH .........
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2014
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 1620
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 4046
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 5407
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Delhi Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Delhi Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Delhi Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.