
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Ajay Deep Singh
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No.1318 of 2012. Date of institution: 24.12.2012 Date of decision: 24.02.2016Isham Singh son of Saale Singh, aged 65 years, resident of village Mansurpur, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar. &helli...
Case Number: 1318
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate R.P.Saini
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 793 of 2013. Date of institution: 05.11.2013 Date of decision: 09.02.2016Rajesh Kumar aged about 30 years son of Sh. Basheshar Nath, resident of village Taranwala, Tehsil Chhachhrauli, Distt. Yam...
Case Number: 793
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-06-2016
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate D.R Saini
Respondant Advocate R.S Dull
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 177/141. Balak Ram Siwan,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:D.R Saini, Advo...
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-01-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Atul jaiswal
Respondant Advocate Ajay Arya
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 1235 of 2010. Date of institution: 24.12.2010 Date of decision: 23.12.2015Rajinder Singh aged about 42 years son of Late Sh. Bissa Singh, resident of House No. 410, Friends Colony, Yamuna Nagar, Teh...
Case Number: 1235
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-01-2016
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate D.S DANIPUR
Respondant Advocate R.S SAINI
CC No.128 of 2013 Pawan Kumar Vs. UHBVNLPresent: None for complainant. Sh.R.S. Saini, Advocate for Ops. Case called several times since morning but neither complainant nor ...
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2015
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate R.K.JINDAL
Respondant Advocate SARAVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No. : 460 of 2010 Date of Institution : 29.10.2010 Date of Decision : 17.11.2015Jatinder Kumar Kalra son of Shri Madan Lal Kalra R/o H.No.106-107, Ekta Vihar, Ambala Cant...
Case Number: 460
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2015
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Shamsher Singh
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 41/151. Vinod Kumar Teontha,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNPundari,Kaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sham...
Case Number: 41
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2015
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate ASHWANI NADRA
Respondant Advocate VIKAS SHARMA
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL Forum Complaint Case No. : 59 of 2014 Date of Institution : 20.02.2014 Date of Decision : 10.11.2015Hakumat Rai S/o ...
Case Number: 59
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-11-2015
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate P.S SHARMA
Respondant Advocate R.S SAINI
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No. : 75 of 2011 Date of Institution : 03.03.2011 Date of Decision : 10.11.2015Vinod Sachdeva S/o Sh. G.L. Sachdeva R/o H.No.18-A, Gobind Nagar, Ambala Cantt.……Complainant.Vers...
Case Number: 75
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-11-2015
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Naveen Kumar
Respondant Advocate Zile singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 166 of 2014. Date of institution: 28.3.2014 Date of decision: 10.11.2015.Daya Wati wife of Sh. Hari Ram resident of Mohan Nagar, Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar. …Complainant. Versu...
Case Number: 166
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvn in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvn ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvn under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.