
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate SANJEEV KUMAR
Respondant Advocate SARAVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA.Complaint Case No. : 454 of 2010Date of Institution : 21.10.2010Date of Decision : 08.07.2015M/s Mahaluxmi Ice Factory, Court Road, Near OBC Bank Ambala City, through its Prop. Sunil Dutt. ...
Case Number: 454
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2015
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate Vinod Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate C.M. Sehgal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No.80 of 2015 Date of Institution: 24.03.2015 Date of Decision: 08.07.2015Shamsher Singh Arya son of Sh. Dayal Singh R/o Ward No.6, Naraingarh, District Ambala. ……Complainant. Versus1. M...
Case Number: 80
|
Date of Filing: 24-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2015
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate Munish Bakshi
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALAComplaint Case No. CC/177/20151. Bir PalDurga Colony, Kala Amb,Tehsil Naraingarh,Distt Ambala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVN LTD.through its Chairman,Shakti Bhawan, Sec-6 Panchkula.2. UHBVN LTD.through its Execut...
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2015
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate In person.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALAComplaint Case No. CC/174/20151. Nathu SinghVill Khudda Kalan, Distt.Ambala through Deepak Kumar............Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVN Ltd.through its SDO 'OP' S/Divn UHBVN Babyal, Tehsil And Distt Ambala.2. UHBVN LTD....
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 26-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2015
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Panjeta
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh Op no.1 to 3,Karnail Singh Op no.4
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No…..393 of 2014. Date of institution: 11.9.2014. Date of decision: 30.6.2015.Balak Ram son of Shri Prabhu Ram, resident of Village Munda Khera, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar. ...
Case Number: 393
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Raghubir Singh
Respondant Advocate Dharamvir Singh
...
Case Number: 421
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-06-2015
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Raghubir Singh
Respondant Advocate Dharamvir Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No…..422 of 2014. Date of institution: 7.10.2014. Date of decision: 5.6.2015.Bachan Singh son of Sh. Sugan Chand, resident of VPO Damla, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar. …...
Case Number: 422
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-06-2015
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Devender Singh
Respondant Advocate R.S Dull
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 31/141. Roshan Lal VPO.Manas,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Devender Si...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2015
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Pathak
Respondant Advocate S.S Punia
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 214/131. Rakesh Kumar Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. Harish Mehta MEMBER For the Complainant:Dinesh Pathak, Advocate For the Opp. Party:...
Case Number: 214
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2015
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Jagdeep Ghangas
Respondant Advocate none
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/14/4351. Superintendent Central ExciseNear Gandhi Mandi panipat through its authorized Signatory Sh. Anil KumarPanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVN LtdThrough its secretary Sakti Bhawan Panchk...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvn in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvn ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvn under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.