
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Chaudhary
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No. : 140 of 2016 Date of Institution : 11.03.2016 Date of Decision : 10.06.2016Rohtas Kumar S/...
Case Number: 140
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2016
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Chaudhary
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No. : 143 of 2016 Date of Institution : 14.03.2016 Date of Decision : 10.06.2016Ram Karan S/o Surjan Kumar R/o village Abupur, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala. &hel...
Case Number: 143
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2016
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Chaudhary
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No. : 144 of 2016 Date of Institution : 14.03.2016 Date of Decision : 10.06.2016 Mukesh Kumar S/o Sher Singh R/o village Kurali, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala. …&hell...
Case Number: 144
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2016
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Rajbir Singh Kadyan
Respondant Advocate Sh.R.S Dhull
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 160/151. Rajesh Kumar VPO Rajound,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNRajound,Kaithal2. Xen,UHBVNPundri,KaithalKaithalHaryana3. UHBVNShaki Bhawan Sec-6,PanchkulaPanchkulaHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh P...
Case Number: 160
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-07-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Mukesh Garg
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 224 of 2014. Date of institution: 13.05.2014. Date of decision: 09.06.2016.Chandra Kishore s/o Sh. Mansha Ram, R/o House No. 6/538, Mohit Vihar, Shree bhuneshwar Mandir Road, Saharanpur, at pres...
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-06-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Mir Chand Saini
Respondant Advocate Dharamvir Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 268 of 2015. Date of institution:29.07.2015 Date of decision:02.06.2016.Vinod Kumar aged about 42 years son of Sh. Karan Singh, resident of village Sandhala, Sub Tehsil Radaur, Tehsil Jagadhri,...
Case Number: 268
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-06-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate S.S.Saini
Respondant Advocate Rajender Kamboj
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 827 of 2013. Date of institution: 19.11.2013. Date of decision: 24.05.2016Om Parkash @ Parkash Chand aged about 65 years son of Sh. Mangat Ram, resident of H. No. 77, Near Spring Delas Public Sch...
Case Number: 827
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Vikrant Singh Chauhan
Respondant Advocate D.S.Kamboj
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 696 of 2013. Date of institution: 24.09.2013. Date of decision: 17.05.2016Chaman aged about 68 years son of Shri Kishori Lal resident of Village Kanhari Kalan, Tehsil Jagadhri, Distt. Yamuna Nagar....
Case Number: 696
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-06-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Rahul Singla
Respondant Advocate Dharamvir Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No…540 of 2013. Date of institution: 26.06.2013 Date of decision: 10.05.2016Jashpal aged about 62 years son of Sh. Pitamber Singh, Nakum R/o VPO Jathalana, Sub Tehsil Radaur, District Yamuna ...
Case Number: 540
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Avdesh Gupta
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 777 of 2013. Date of institution: 23.10.2013. Date of decision: 04.05.2016Rajesh Rathaur aged about 53 years son of Sh. Joginder Singh Rathaur, Gud Mandi Road,Industrial Area, Yamuna Nagar. &he...
Case Number: 777
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvn in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvn ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvn under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.