Paytm
Latest Judgments
Total 322 Consumer Court Cases Against Paytm.
Paytm V/S Ajay Kumar
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate Rakesh Bangla
Respondant Advocate Vineet Bajaj
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KURUKSHETRA. Consumer Complaint No.50 of 2019. Date of Instt.:5.02.2019 Date of Decision: 12.03.2021Ajay Kumar son of Shri Milakh Raj resident of house No.1342, Sector -7, U.E.Kurukshe...
Case Number: 50
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2021
PayTm V/S Charan Singh
Court Name: Muradabad-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Dispossed Off Converted into CC/10/2020...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2020
|
Date of Upload: 16-10-2020
PAYTM V/S SOMDUTT MANCHANDA
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
22.09.2020Complaint Case No.: 96/2020Somnath Manchanda vs. Paytm LimitedPresent: Mrs. Kiran Yadav, Counsel for the ComplainantOn the last date of hearing, we have heard the arguments of Ld. Counsel Shri Naresh Yadav for the complainant. The case of the complainant is as he has re...
Case Number: 96
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2020
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2020
Paytm V/S Sunil Kumar
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KURUKSHETRA.Consumer Complaint No.106 of 2018.Date of Instt.:11.05.2018.Date of Decision: 12.03.2020Sunil Kumar4 Kaushik son of Sh.Balwant Rai Sharma, House No.1190/12, Ramnagar colony, Thanesar, District Kurukshetra. &hellip...
Case Number: 106
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-03-2020
Paytm Regional Office V/S Sunny Kumar Advocate
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Sunny Kumar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOTComplaint No. : 242 of 2019Date of Institution : 27.09.2019Date of Decision : 04.03.2020Sunny Kumar Advocate Chamber No.86, District Courts, Faridkot. .....ComplainantVersusPAYTEM, Regional Office, 144/533, 2nd Floor, 22nd Main...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 04-06-2020
Paytm V/S Kanisth Ganeriwala Advocate
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate D.N. Ganeriwala Adv. & Sukhveer S. Khillianwali Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:727 of 2019Date of Institution:08.08.2019Date of Decision:28.02.2020Kanisth Ganeriwala, Advocate, aged 32 years, s/o D.N.Ganeriwala, R/o H.No.323, Advocate’s Enclave, Sector 49-A, Chan...
Case Number: 727
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2019
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2020
Paytm Payments Bank V/S Karamveer Mandhan
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Karambir Mandhan
Respondant Advocate Seema Bhardwaj
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 107 of 2019 Date of instt.25.02.2019 Date of Decision 20.01.2020Karamveer Mandhan aged about 42 years, son of Shri Jasmer Singh, resident of House no.12, Krishna Colony, Kunjpura Road, Karnal. &hell...
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2020
Paytm Head Office V/S Anil Verma
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Vineet Bajaj
Anil Verma Vs Paytm Head office & anr. Present: None for complainant. Sh. Vinit Bajaj, Advocate for the OP No.1. Sh. Arvind Kumar , Advocate for Op No.2. Case again called up several times after lunch break but none has turned up on behalf of comp...
Case Number: 279
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2019
Paytm Head Quarter V/S Sarika Kumari
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate N.S. Chaudhary
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Execution no. 60 of 2019 Date of instt.: 16.05.2019 Date of Decision 15.07.2019Sarika Kumari wife of Vishal resident of 211-L, Model town, Karnal, Haryana. …..DH/Complainant VersusPaytm head quarter, one ...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2019
Paytm V/S Shri Neelkant Gargya
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Nitin Pathania Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTIRCT Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh CC/172/2019Neelkant Gargya vs. PaytmBEFORE: HON’BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT HON’BLE MRS. PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBER Hon’ble MR. RAVINDER SINGH , MEMBER Hon’ble MR. RAVINDER SINGH , PRESENT: ...
Case Number: 172
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 12-06-2019
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Paytm in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Paytm ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Paytm under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.