
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Sethi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Notice in this appeal was issued to the respondents on 06.10.2017 and the matter was adjourned to 08.11.2017. Notices sent to respondents No.2 at 4th address and respondent No.4 were received back unserved with the remarks “addressee not known”. However, notic...
Case Number: 238
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Brijesh Khosla Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:76 of 2018Date of Institution:05.02.2018Date of Decision:20.07.2018Mohit Gupta son of Sh.Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Resident of #338, Sector 30-A, Chandigarh Post Code 160030 ……..Com...
Case Number: 76
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2018
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate gurdeep Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, Court Room No.19, Block-C,Judicial Court Complex, BATHINDA-151001 (PUNJAB)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/17/322( Date of Filing : 10 Nov 2017 )1. satinderpal singhabout 26 years S/o Sh.ranjit Singh,R/o h.no.20959, street no.2 p...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 10-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
The complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same ...
Case Number: 279
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2018
Court Name: North West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/924/2016( Date of Filing : 08 Sep 2016 )1. RAHUL PRAKASH SAINIS/O SH.OM PRAKASH C/O SARVESH KUMAR,R/O J-235,1ST FLOOR KRISHANA PARTA...
Case Number: 924
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2018
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Ram Singh Chauhan
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/16/178( Date of Filing : 03 May 2016 )1. Mukesh Kumars/o Kamlesh Kumar r/o H.No. 175 Ward No.9 Zora Basti Patran Teh PatranpatialaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Paytm HeadquartersB-121 Sector ...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-06-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Adv. Brijesh Khosla
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file a fresh compla...
Case Number: 857
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-11-2017
Paytm Paytm One 97 Communications
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Vishal Kundi
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.98 of 2016 Date of instt. 30.03.2016 Date of decision:15.9.2017Paveen Mehta age 27 years, son of Shri Atam Parkash Mehta, resident of House no.128, ward no.3, Chaudhary Mohalla, Taraori, District Karnal. ...
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2017
Paytm Paytm One 97 Communications
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Vishal Kundi
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.99 of 2016 Date of instt. 30.03.2016 Date of decision:15.9.2017Vikas Mehta age 21 years, son of Shri Atam Parkash Mehta, resident of House no.128, ward no.3, Chaudhary Mohalla, Taraori, District Karnal. ...
Case Number: 99
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2017
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Sh. Udit Goyal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRURJUDICIAL COURT COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, SANGRUR (148001)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/225/20171. Charanjit SachdevaCharanjit Sachdeva aged about 41 years S/o Bhagwan Dass, R/o Sackdeva Niwas, SCF 14, New Grain Market Ward No. 11, Bhawan...
Case Number: 225
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Paytm in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Paytm ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Paytm under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.