company-name-logo

Paytm

Latest Judgments

Total 322 Consumer Court Cases Against Paytm.

Chandigarh

Kavish Gupta V/S Paytm E Commerce Pvt. Ltd.

Paytm   Paytm   E Commerce  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vivek Sethi, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER Notice in this appeal was issued to the respondents on 06.10.2017 and the matter was adjourned to 08.11.2017. Notices sent to respondents No.2 at 4th address and respondent No.4 were received back unserved with the remarks “addressee not known”. However, notic...

Case Number: 238

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 09-08-2018

Chandigarh

Paytm Headquaters V/S Mohit Gupta

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Brijesh Khosla Adv.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:76 of 2018Date of Institution:05.02.2018Date of Decision:20.07.2018Mohit Gupta son of Sh.Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Resident of #338, Sector 30-A, Chandigarh Post Code 160030 ……..Com...

Case Number: 76

|

Date of Filing: 02-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 24-08-2018

Punjab

Paytm V/S satinderpal singh

Paytm  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate gurdeep Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, Court Room No.19, Block-C,Judicial Court Complex, BATHINDA-151001 (PUNJAB)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/17/322( Date of Filing : 10 Nov 2017 )1. satinderpal singhabout 26 years S/o Sh.ranjit Singh,R/o h.no.20959, street no.2 p...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 10-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 31-05-2018

Chandigarh

M/s Paytm India Headquarters V/S Sohan Lal

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

The complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same ...

Case Number: 279

|

Date of Filing: 15-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 21-05-2018

Delhi

PAYTM V/S RAHUL PRAKASH SAINI

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: North West

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/924/2016( Date of Filing : 08 Sep 2016 )1. RAHUL PRAKASH SAINIS/O SH.OM PRAKASH C/O SARVESH KUMAR,R/O J-235,1ST FLOOR KRISHANA PARTA...

Case Number: 924

|

Date of Filing: 08-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 23-04-2018

Punjab

Paytm Headquarters V/S Mukesh Kumar

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: Patiala

Appelant Advocate Ram Singh Chauhan

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/16/178( Date of Filing : 03 May 2016 )1. Mukesh Kumars/o Kamlesh Kumar r/o H.No. 175 Ward No.9 Zora Basti Patran Teh PatranpatialaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Paytm HeadquartersB-121 Sector ...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 03-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 27-06-2018

Chandigarh

Paytm Headquarters V/S Mohit Gupta

Paytm  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Adv. Brijesh Khosla

Respondant Advocate

Counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file a fresh compla...

Case Number: 857

|

Date of Filing: 03-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 08-11-2017

Haryana

Paytm Head Quarter, One 97 Communications V/S Parveen Mehta S/o Atam Parkash Mehta

Paytm   Paytm   One 97 Communications  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Vishal Kundi

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.98 of 2016 Date of instt. 30.03.2016 Date of decision:15.9.2017Paveen Mehta age 27 years, son of Shri Atam Parkash Mehta, resident of House no.128, ward no.3, Chaudhary Mohalla, Taraori, District Karnal. ...

Case Number: 98

|

Date of Filing: 30-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 22-09-2017

Haryana

Paytm Head Quarter, One 97 Communications V/S Vikash Mehta S/o Atam Parkash Mehta

Paytm   Paytm   One 97 Communications  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Vishal Kundi

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.99 of 2016 Date of instt. 30.03.2016 Date of decision:15.9.2017Vikas Mehta age 21 years, son of Shri Atam Parkash Mehta, resident of House no.128, ward no.3, Chaudhary Mohalla, Taraori, District Karnal. ...

Case Number: 99

|

Date of Filing: 30-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 22-09-2017

Punjab

Paytm V/S Charanjit Sachdeva

Paytm  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Sh. Udit Goyal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRURJUDICIAL COURT COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, SANGRUR (148001)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/225/20171. Charanjit SachdevaCharanjit Sachdeva aged about 41 years S/o Bhagwan Dass, R/o Sackdeva Niwas, SCF 14, New Grain Market Ward No. 11, Bhawan...

Case Number: 225

|

Date of Filing: 22-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 19-09-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Paytm in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Paytm ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Paytm under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.