company-name-logo

Paytm

Latest Judgments

Total 322 Consumer Court Cases Against Paytm.

Haryana

PayTM Corporate Office V/S Sh. Nirmal Singh

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Brijesh Sharma

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No.763 of 2019 Date of instt. 14.11.2019 Date of Decision:21.04.2022Shri Nirmal Singh son of Shri Ram Kumar, resident of 1058 Sector-32, Urban Estate, Karnal. …….Complainant...

Case Number: 763

|

Date of Filing: 14-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2022

Chandigarh

Kanisth Ganeriwala V/S Paytm

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Puneet Kakkar Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHAppeal No.84 of 2020Date of Institution17.06.2020Date of Decision25.02.2022Paytm C/o One 97 Communications Ltd., B-121, Sector 5, Noida 201301 (UP) through its Authorized Officer Mr. Sharadindu Mukherjee.&hel...

Case Number: 84

|

Date of Filing: 17-06-2020

|

Date of Upload: 02-03-2022

Karnataka

Paytm India V/S Gautam Kumar

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/240/2021( Date of Filing : 01 Mar 2021 )1. Gautam KumarAged 32 years, No.903, Block 4, S...

Case Number: 240

|

Date of Filing: 01-03-2021

|

Date of Upload: 07-03-2022

Punjab

PayTM Flights V/S Davinder Singh

Paytm  

Court Name: Moga

Appelant Advocate Sh Jatinder Singh Kingra

Respondant Advocate Sh.Uttam Singh

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX,ROOM NOS. B209-B214, BEAS BLOCK, MOGAComplaint Case No. CC/81/2019( Date of Filing : 23 Sep 2019 )1. Davinder SinghS/o Harbans Singh R/o Village Buttar Teh and Distt MogaMogaPunjab...........Complainant(s...

Case Number: 81

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2019

|

Date of Upload: 09-02-2022

Karnataka

1. M/s. PAYTM Payments Bank V/S Sri. Manigandan G

Paytm   Paytm   Paytm Payments Bank  

Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/105/2020( Date of Filing : 03 Feb 2020 )1. Sri. Manigandan G............Complainant(s)Ve...

Case Number: 105

|

Date of Filing: 03-02-2020

|

Date of Upload: 07-03-2022

Rajasthan

PAYTM V/S SHAILESH SHARMA S/O VED PRAKASH SHARMA

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: Churu

Appelant Advocate RRP AD

Respondant Advocate KRIPAL SINGH

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/336/2017( Date of Filing : 05 Oct 2017 )1. SHAILESH SHARMA S/O VED PRAKASH SHARMAWARD NO.3 GOMJI SUNAR KA KUWA LING ROAD RATANGARH CHURUCHURURAJASTHAN...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PAYTMC/O MANAGER B-121 SECTOR 5 NOIDA NOIDAUTTAR PRADESH2....

Case Number: 336

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 09-12-2021

Haryana

Paytm Mall V/S Hitesh Garg

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Seema Bharadwaj

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 670 of 2019 Date of instt.27.09.2019 Date of Decision 02.07.2021Hitesh Garg son of Tarsem Garg, resident of 341-B, ward no.15, near Deep Hospital, Taraori (Karnal). …….Complainant...

Case Number: 670

|

Date of Filing: 27-09-2019

|

Date of Upload: 02-08-2021

Uttar Pradesh

PAYTM V/S DR. S. NAGESH

Paytm  

Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Miscellaneous Application No. MA/149/2021( Date of Filing : 24 Mar 2021 )In1. DR. S. NAGESHB 1, 603, POCKET 4, BUILDERS AREA, HIMSAGAR APARTMENT, GREATER NOIDA, ...........Appellant(s)Versu...

Case Number: 149

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2021

|

Date of Upload: 01-04-2021

Haryana

Paytm V/S suraj

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: Bhiwani

Appelant Advocate in person

Respondant Advocate Sanjay Sharma

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/100/2018( Date of Filing : 12 Jul 2018 )1. surajH.no 34/39 Ward 24 Manan Pani Bhiwani...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PaytmF-44 Sector 6 Noida............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Shriniwas Khundia M...

Case Number: 100

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 19-03-2021

Haryana

Paytm V/S Anirudh

Paytm  

Court Name: Bhiwani

Appelant Advocate in person

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/106/2018( Date of Filing : 29 Aug 2018 )1. AnirudhSon of Lalit Aggarwal vpo neem Chowk Bhiwani...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PaytmF-44 F Block Sector 6 Noida............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Sh...

Case Number: 106

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2018

|

Date of Upload: 19-03-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Paytm in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Paytm ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Paytm under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.