company-name-logo

Paytm

Latest Judgments

Total 322 Consumer Court Cases Against Paytm.

Gujarat

Paytm E-commerece Pvt Ltd V/S Hiten Haridas Thacker

Paytm  

Court Name: Kachchh

Appelant Advocate F H Dholakiya

Respondant Advocate K M Charaniya

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2019

|

Date of Upload: 30-10-2023

Punjab

PayTM Mobile Solutions Ltd. V/S Rahul Behl

Paytm  

Court Name: Amritsar

Appelant Advocate Updip Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 125

|

Date of Filing: 14-02-2019

|

Date of Upload: 27-10-2023

Rajasthan

PAYTM V/S DILIP KUMAR AGARWAL

Paytm  

Court Name: Jaipur-II

Appelant Advocate BHANU PARTAP

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 707

|

Date of Filing: 23-11-2022

|

Date of Upload: 19-10-2023

Rajasthan

PAYTM PAYMENT BANK V/S SUMIT SINGAL

Paytm  

Court Name: Jodhpur-II

Appelant Advocate MAHINDAR PAREEK

Respondant Advocate VINEET R DAVE

Case Number: 173

|

Date of Filing: 02-09-2020

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2023

Rajasthan

PAYTM V/S IRSHAD

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: Bhilwara

Appelant Advocate SURESH CHANDRA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 35

|

Date of Filing: 14-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 05-10-2023

Punjab

PAYTM Head Qurters V/S Ishu Bansal

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Sh Santosh Kumar

Respondant Advocate Sh. Tanuj Sharma

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SANGRUR. RBT Complaint No. 80Instituted on:08.03.2018 Decided on : 14.09.2023Ishu Bansal aged about 26 years S/o Sh. Megh Raj Resident of H.No.113, Street No.3, Sital Colony, Hira Mahal, near State Bank of Patiala ( now mer...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 08-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 18-09-2023

Punjab

PAYTM Head Qurters V/S Rakesh Kumar

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Sh Davinder Partap

Respondant Advocate Sh. Tanuj Sharma

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SANGRUR. RBT Complaint No. 81Instituted on :08.03.2018 Decided on : 14.09.2023Rakesh Kumar aged about 28 years, S/o Sh. Tarsem Chand resident of Lakhwali Basti, Patran, Tehsil Patran and District Patiala. …. Complai...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 08-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 18-09-2023

Kerala

THE NODEL OFFICER, PAYTM PAYMENTS BANK LIMITED V/S JOE JACOB

Paytm   Paytm   Paytm Payments Bank  

Court Name: Kottayam

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamKottayamComplaint Case No. CC/122/2023( Date of Filing : 28 Apr 2023 )1. JOE JACOBPULICKATHUNDIYIL HOUSE,RPC P.O,VANDANPATHAL,MUNDAKAYAM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE NODEL OFFICER, PAYTM PAYMENTS BANK LIMITEDV.J. TOWERS,A-6,SECTO...

Case Number: 122

|

Date of Filing: 28-04-2023

|

Date of Upload: 18-08-2023

Assam

Paytm Mall V/S Shri Krishno Kanto Barooah

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: Kamrup

Appelant Advocate Shri P.Baruah

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSU0MER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONKAMRUP,GUWAHATIComplaint Case No. CC/52/2019( Date of Filing : 20 Sep 2019 )1. Shri Krishno Kanto BarooahS/O- Late Keshab Kanto Barooah,R/O-61, Kharghuli Main Road,Guwahati,Dist-Kamrup(M)-781004,Assam...........Complainant(s)Versus1...

Case Number: 52

|

Date of Filing: 20-09-2019

|

Date of Upload: 28-07-2023

Uttar Pradesh

PAYTM POSTPAID V/S AMBESH KUMAR GAUTAM

Paytm   Paytm  

Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSIONGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/397/2023( Date of Filing : 21 May 2023 )1. AMBESH KUMAR GAUTAMJAMUNA KUNJ INFRONT OF DISTRICT JUDGE RESIDENCE MAHARAJ NAGAR CIVIL LINES BUDAUNBUDAUNUTTAR PRADESH....

Case Number: 397

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-2023

|

Date of Upload: 09-08-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Paytm in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Paytm ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Paytm under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.