company-name-logo

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited

Latest Judgments

Total 74 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited.

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Harpreet Singh Dhot

Omaxe   Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:726 of 2016Date of Institution:24.10.2016Date of Decision:27.02.2017Harpreet Singh Dhot son of Late Sh.Niranjan Singh Dhot, #174, Mohindra Complex, Kheri Gujran Road, Patiala, Punjab.……C...

Case Number: 726

|

Date of Filing: 24-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 28-02-2017

Chandigarh

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Shashi Kala Gupta

Omaxe   Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:489 of 2016Date of Institution:19.08.2016Date of Decision:08.02.2017Shashi Kala Gupta wife of Sh. Satinder Kumar Gupta, resident of House No.1, Sector 12, Panchkula.……ComplainantV e r s ...

Case Number: 489

|

Date of Filing: 19-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-02-2017

Chandigarh

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Shashi Kala Gupta

Omaxe   Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:488 of 2016Date of Institution:19.08.2016Date of Decision:08.02.2017Shashi Kala Gupta wife of Sh. Satinder Kumar Gupta, resident of House No.1, Sector 12, Panchkula.……ComplainantV e r s ...

Case Number: 488

|

Date of Filing: 19-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-02-2017

Chandigarh

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Shashi Kala Gupta

Omaxe   Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar,Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:487 of 2016Date of Institution:19.08.2016Date of Decision:08.02.2017Shashi Kala Gupta wife of Sh. Satinder Kumar Gupta, resident of House No.1, Sector 12, Panchkula.……ComplainantV e r s ...

Case Number: 487

|

Date of Filing: 19-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-02-2017

Chandigarh

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Shashi Kala Gupta

Omaxe   Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:486 of 2016Date of Institution:19.08.2016Date of Decision:08.02.2017Shashi Kala Gupta wife of Sh. Satinder Kumar Gupta, resident of House No.1, Sector 12, Panchkula.……ComplainantV e r s ...

Case Number: 486

|

Date of Filing: 19-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-02-2017

Punjab

Rajbir Singh Guron & another V/S Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Pawan Kumar Gupta & Munish Gupta

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1443

|

Date of Filing: 24-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 20-02-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Brij Mohan

Omaxe   Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Balwinder Singh Kalsi, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:497 of 2016Date of Institution:22.08.2016Date of Decision:06.02.2017Ms.Parmod Khanna wife of Sh.Vijay Khanna, aged about 65 years.Ms.Garima Khanna daughter of Sh.Vijay Khanna.Both residents of H.No.26...

Case Number: 725

|

Date of Filing: 21-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Komal Gandhi

Omaxe   Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:511 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:25.01.2017Komal Gandhi wife of Sh.Aman Gandhi, resident of # 866, Sector 4, Panchkula, Haryana, currently residing in 8601-West-142nd Terrace,...

Case Number: 511

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 30-01-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited & anr. V/S Surinder Kumar Mehta

Omaxe   Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:530 of 2016Date of Institution:31.08.2016Date of Decision:20.12.2016Surinder Kumar Mehta son of Sh.S.L. Mehta, resident of #5, NAC, Manimajra, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s Omax...

Case Number: 530

|

Date of Filing: 31-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2016

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Sachin Banga

Omaxe   Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:165 of 2016Date of Institution:27.04.2016Date of Decision:22.08.2016Lavinder Mann wife of Hardeep Singh Mann.Hardeep Singh Mann son of Paratama Singh.Both residents of House No.3, Rajbaha Road, Patial...

Case Number: 63

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-03-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.