Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Latest Judgments
Total 74 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited.
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Smt. Sanjila Bansal
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:787 of 2017Date of Institution:09.11.2017Date of Decision:17.10.2018Smt.Sanjila Bansal, W/o Dr.Yogender Bansal, R/o # 1154, Sector 24-B, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s Omaxe Chan...
Case Number: 787
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Rohan Goel
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today in Court, four demand drafts bearing No.030890 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,86,981/-, 030891 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,81,633/-, 030892 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,86,981/- & 030893 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,81,633/-, totaling Rs.23,37...
Case Number: 260
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Simran Kamboj
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Sh. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the judgment debtors and not controverted by Sh. Sunil Kamboj, brother of Ms. Simran Kamboj, decree holder/complainant that an amount of Rs.19,19,795/- was transferred in the account of the decree holder/complainant by the judgment d...
Case Number: 180
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Komal Gandhi
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today in Court, to satisfy the claim raised by the decree holder, Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the judgment debtors has handed over two cheques bearing Nos.208478 dated 21.09.2018 in the sum of Rs.6 Lakhs and 208479 dated 22.09.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,98,042/- to Sh....
Case Number: 231
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Priyanka Ahuja
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amandeep Singh Nirmaan, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per Buyer’s Agreement dated 06.07.2012, the opposite party committed to hand over possession of the unit (flat), in question, on or before 03.07.2015. The possession has not been delivered till today. Counsel for the opposite party states that possession is likely to be ...
Case Number: 732
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Dr. Sunil Sethi
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:788 of 2017Date of Institution:09.11.2017Date of Decision:10.08.2018Dr.Sunil Sethi S/o Sh.H.C., Sethi, R/o H.No.542, Sector 11-B, Chandigarh.…… ComplainantV e r s u sM/s Omaxe Chandigarh...
Case Number: 788
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Mr. Rakesh Singh Rawat
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, it is stated by Counsel for both the parties that the matter has amicably been settled. Copy of the Settlement Deed dated 30.07.2018 has been placed on record. In terms of the aforesaid Settlement Deed, this complaint stands disposed of. We make it v...
Case Number: 689
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-07-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Sonia Sharma
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today, in Court, Counsel for the judgment debtors has handed over two demand drafts bearing Nos.030151 & 030187, both dated 19.06.2018 in the sum of Rs.9,50,000/- each and six post-dated cheques bearing Nos.865384, 865386 & 965388, dated 03.07.2018, 03.09.2018 & 03.11...
Case Number: 165
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-06-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Rohan Goel
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggaral, Adv.
At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is stated by Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties, on getting instructions from Sh. Deepanjit Singh, Senior Manager (Legal) that the Opposite Parties are ready to refu...
Case Number: 771
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Annkur Soni
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
ORDER At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. We appreciate the stand taken by both the parties. In continuation of our order passed on the last date of hearing i.e. 06.04.2018, Counsel for the Opposite Party, on getting instructions, ...
Case Number: 654
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.