Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Latest Judgments
Total 74 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited.
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Mrs. Palvinder Kaur
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kabir Sarin, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:764 of 2017Date of Institution:31.10.2017Date of Decision:26.03.2018Mrs.Palvinder Kaur, w/o Mr.Sukhwinder Singh, r/o Flat No.5123/3, Modern Housing Complex, Manimajra, Chandigarh U.T. through Sh.Tejin...
Case Number: 764
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Pawan Manchanda
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is stated by Sh.Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party on getting instructions from the Company that for the delayed period whereof 07.07.2014 on the amount paid upto that dat...
Case Number: 371
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Simran Kamboj
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This execution application was filed, when cheque issued towards second installment payable on 15.12.2017 was dishonoured. It is stated that the said amount was transferred with penalty amount to the account of the decree holder/complainant. During pendency of this execution appl...
Case Number: 24
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Sonia Sharma
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the parties that the matter stands settled. It has been agreed by the Opposite Parties to refund the entire amount deposited by the complainants with the Opposite Parties, with interest @8% p.a. from the respective dates of deposit. The entire payment,...
Case Number: 634
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2018
BRIJ MOHAN & ANR. V/S M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LEXJURIS
Respondant Advocate MR.BALWAINDER S.KALSI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 614 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 06/02/2017 in Complaint No. 725/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED10, LOCAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, KALKAJI,...
Case Number: 614
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Vijay Garg
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amitabh Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party raised a very serious objection qua maintainability of this complaint stating that as on today, the total value of the product and the relief claimed would come beyond Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel for t...
Case Number: 692
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Lakhbir Singh
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim aggarwal, Adv.
Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties raised a very serious objection that as on today, the total value of the product and the relief claimed would come beyond Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this compl...
Case Number: 643
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Mr. Rakesh Kumar
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
The Decree holders/complainants have moved a Miscellaneous Application bearing No.1217 of 2017 also listed for today, for withdrawal of present execution application. It is stated that the facilities have not been provided at the spot, as such, it is not possible to live in the u...
Case Number: 329
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Rajinder Kumar Sood
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Kapil Kumar Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-IIU.T. ChandigarhFINAL ORDERComplaint Case No. CC/855/20171. Rajinder Kumar Soodson of Shri Sardha Ram, Resident of House No. 1132, Sector 12-A, Panchkula.2. Promila Soodwife of Shri Rajinder Kumar Sood, Resident of House No. 1132, Secto...
Case Number: 855
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Vivek Malhotra
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
ORDER Counsel for the parties state that the matter has amicably been settled. The Opposite Party shall pay interest on the deposited amount @7% p.a. for the delay period i.e. from 05.03.2014 till 12.05.2016 when possession was offered. The payment of interest compensation shall...
Case Number: 229
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-11-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.