Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Latest Judgments
Total 74 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited.
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Kulwinder Kaur
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arora Vishwas Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:166 of 2017Date of Institution:21.02.2017Date of Decision:12-Oct-17Kulwinder Kaur wife of Lt.Col. Hardev Singh Hundal, resident of House No.700, New Bank Wali Gali, Rayya District Amritsar, Punjab.Lt....
Case Number: 166
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Sheshpal Sharma
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
ORDER In terms of order passed by us on 21.07.2017, Counsel for the Opposite Parties has placed on record one affidavit, Paras 2 & 3 which reads thus:-“2. That the green area on the backside is available exclusively to the allottee, who is on the ground floor, raised on...
Case Number: 209
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2017
LALITHA SAINI V/S M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED & 2 ORS.
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1364 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 05/05/2017 in Complaint No. 62/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED & 2 ORS.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTO...
Case Number: 1364
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Simran Kamboj
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
ORDER The matter has amicably been settled. It is stated by Sh. Munish Gupta Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties that the entire amount paid by the complainant shall be returned to the complainant with interest @9.25% p.a. (simple) leviable w.e.f. the dates of respective p...
Case Number: 297
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-08-2017
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Sandeep Alipuria
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better facts and also on taking issue of charging PLC with the Opposite Parties, as per his statement, the adjoining vacant plot has been conv...
Case Number: 445
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Brij Mohan
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the judgment debtors has placed on record copy of order dated 23.05.2017 passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.614 of 2017, which reads thus :-“Notice on admission to the Respondents returnable on 19....
Case Number: 175
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Megh Raj
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Somesh Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:966 of 2016Date of Institution:28.12.2016Date of Decision:17.05.2017Megh Raj aged about 67 years, son of Late Sh.Mohan Dass, resident of House No.1184, Phase-9, Mohali (SAS Nagar).……Comp...
Case Number: 966
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Rajeev Shastri
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:919 of 2016Date of Institution:14.12.2016Date of Decision:05.05.2017Rajeev Shastri S/o Sh. Ramesh Kumar r/o Vill. Kharar, P.O. Kharota, Tehsil Jawali, Distt. Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, current residin...
Case Number: 919
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Surinder Kansal
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file the same before the proper Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and all the three ...
Case Number: 265
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited & Others V/S Sushil Kumar & Others
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Saurabh Gautam Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:584 of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:22.03.2017Sushil Kumar son of Sh.Chander Bhan Bansal, resident of House No.99, Sector 16, Panchkula.Sushil Kumar son of Sh.Ram Sarup, residenc...
Case Number: 584
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.