
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANURAG TOMAR
Respondant Advocate MR. S.A. SATTAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2454 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 18/02/2013 in Appeal No. 702/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. UPENDRA DUTT SHARMAS/O LATE SHRI G.S SHARMA, R/O B-56, RAJ NAGAR, JWALAPUR HARIDWARUTTRAKHAND.......
Case Number: 2454
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-08-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Monika Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/91/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Northern RailwayChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Balbir SinghR/o House No. 3197, Sector-15/D, Chandigarh...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABL...
Case Number: 91
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANURAG TOMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 74 OF 2014 IN RP/2454/20131. UPENDRA DUTT SHARMA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAY BARODA HOUSE...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAI...
Case Number: 74
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANURAG TOMAR
Respondant Advocate MR. S.A. SATTAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2454 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 18/02/2013 in Appeal No. 70/2011 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/7/20141. UPENDRA DUTT SHARMAS/O LATE SHRI G.S SHARMA, R/O B-56, RAJ NAGAR, JWALAPUR HARIDWA...
Case Number: 2454
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESHWAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2254 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/07/2007 in Appeal No. 6/2001 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. STATION SUPERINTENDED NORTHERN RAILWAY & ORS Northern RailwaySriganganagarRajasthan2. CHIEF COM...
Case Number: 2254
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. REKHA AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2066 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/11/2011 in Appeal No. 347/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAY & 3 ORS.Northern Railway BikanerRajasthan2. Chief Commerci...
Case Number: 2066
|
Date of Filing: 25-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. REKHA AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate MR. MUKESH CHAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1280 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 21/03/2007 in Appeal No. 607/2006 of the State Commission Bihar)1. GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAY NEW DELHI - -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. AMAR BHUSHAN VE...
Case Number: 1280
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Prem Prakas Srivastava
Respondant Advocate Sarvesh Kumar Sharma
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2012/154(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Gen Manager Northern RailwayDelhi...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Ha...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 265
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. Veena B. Sethi, Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv. for respondents no. 1 & 2, None for proforma respondent no. 3 to 8
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 472 of 2010 1. Northern Railway Moradabad DivisionMoradabad through Senior Divisional Commercial Manager ...........Appellant(s)V...
Case Number: 472
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Northern Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Northern Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Northern Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.