
Krishan Pal filed a consumer case on 04 Jun 2018 against M/S. M2K Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. in the New Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is EA/64/2014 and the judgment uploaded on 14 Jun 2018.
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI
(DISTT. NEW DELHI),
‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE,
NEW DELHI-110001
Ex. No./64/2014 Dated:
In the matter of:
Dr. Krishan Pal,
S/o Sh. Balbir Singh,
R/o Village & P.O. Wazirabad,
Mohalla Manohar Marg,
Distt.Gurgaon, Haryana ….Decree Holder
Versus
M2K Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
E-13/29, Harsh Bhawan,
Connaught Circus, New Delhi-110001
Through its Authorised Representative
Vipin Jain.
……. Judgment Debtor
MEMBER: H.M. VYAS
ORDER
An execution has been filed by the D.H. for compliance of the final order dated 13/12/13 by the JD. During the pendency of the present execution the JD made the payment of an amount of Rs. 08,71,829/- through cheque received by the Ld counsel for the DH on 15/05/14 with the calculations. The DH also filed the calculations alleging that JD has not complied with the orders of this Forum and alleged that still certain amount is payable by the JD. The JD filed objections to the same after payment of amount of Rs. 08,71,829/- through cheque.
Both the parties on the direction of this Forum filed their respective calculations The Ld. Counsel for DH in its calculation sheet has shown balance amount payable. The interest @ 18 % on the amount since the dates of respective deposits till the realization i.e. up to the date of receipt of the cheque for Rs. 08,71,829/- has been calculated by the DH & then the deduction of 15 % from the deposited amount thereafter.
It is argued by the Ld counsel for the DH that the Hon’ble State Commission vide orders dated 06/06/2016 in R.P. NO. 46/14 set aside the orders of this Forum and matter was remanded back to this Forum for proceeding further in accordance with Law. Thus the scope of this execution stands extended and therefore, he is entitled for the amount as calculated in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble National Commission, in the case of Housing Commissioner Karnataka Vs . K.A. Nagamani (decided on 07/02/2017) and M/s M2K infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V/s Kavinder Kinha (decide on 13/07/15). The calculations have been accordingly made and prayed for directions in his favor.
In rebuttal the Ld. Counsel for JD has referred to the operative part of the final order dated 13/12/2013 which reads as under:
“ In the circumstances, we hold OP deficient in services and direct it to deduct 15% of BSP from the amount deposited by the complainant and refund the balance with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of demand letter in 2009 till date of payment and pay compensation of Rs.50,000/- inclusive of litigation charges. In case, the complainant wants the allotment here, if available, it will be paying balance with interest.
The order shall be complied within 30 days of the receipt of the copy of order; otherwise action can be taken u/s 25/27 of the Consumer Protection Act.”
It is argued on behalf of the JD that the entire amount in terms of the decree/orders has been paid to the DH as per calculation sheet filed,. The amount paid by the JD to DH is not disputed on behalf of DH.
It is argued by Ld. Counsel for the JD that after the payment of the excretal amount, this Forum issued on 05/06/2014 issued the warrant/attachment which was challenged by the JD. The copy of Revision Petition placed on record. The Hon’ble State Commission set aside said order dated 05/06/2014 only and final order dated 13/12/2013 of which the execution is pending continues to remain in force. It is further argued that the final orders were not challenged by either of the parties and as such have attained finality. Further, the judgment of the Hon’ble National Commission is not applicable in the facts & circumstances of this execution.
We have given due consideration to the material placed before us and the argument addressed with relevant provisions of law.
The order of this Forum is unambiguous and clear. In terms thereof, the amount of 15% of BSP is to be deducted from the amount deposited by the complainant/DH and the refund of the balance with 9% p.a. interest from the date of demand letter in 2009 till the date of payment and the compensation of Rs.50,000/- was awarded..
It is not disputed that the amount of Rs. 08,71,829/- has been received by the DH as shown in the calculation sheet filed by the JD. The calculation sheet filed by the JD indicates the deduction and the calculation of interest as per the final orders dated 13/12/13. The calculations given by the DH are not in terms of the final orders passed by this Forum.
We are, therefore, of the considered view that the submissions/argument of Ld. Counsel for DH are at variance to the order dated 13/12/2013 passed by this Forum and are not sustainable. Since no other issue is raised by either of the parties. In view of above discussions, we dispose of the execution having been satisfied as the JD has made the payment to the DH as per the decree/order dated 13/12/13.
Copy of the order may be forwarded to the parties to the case free of cost as statutorily required.
Announced in open Forum on 04/06/2018.
The orders be uploaded on www.confonet.nic.in.
File be consigned to record room.
(ARUN KUMAR ARYA)
PRESIDENT
(H M VYAS)
MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.