
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI(DISTRICT NEW DELHI, M-BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR,VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P. ESTATE. NEW DELHI-1100001.C.C.No.1392/2009Ashok Singh,R/o A-151, Wellington Estate-2,DLF Ph. V, Gurguan,Haryana-122002.Vs.Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd.9th Foor, Godrej C...
Case Number: 1392
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2019
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Shibnath Bhattacharya
Respondant Advocate Mr. P. K. Giri.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Revision Petition No. RP/225/2017( Date of Filing : 09 Oct 2017 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/09/2017 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/275/2017 of District Kolkata-II(Central))1. Ko...
Case Number: 225
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate G.S. AHLUWALIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 1189 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 06.10.2017 Date of Decision: 05.03.2019The Manager, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, near 1 & 2 Chowk, NH-2, NIT, Faridabad, Haryana.…..Appellant-Opp...
Case Number: 1189
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shikhar Srivastav
Respondant Advocate Adeel Ahmad Opp.No.2
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2010/1994( Date of Filing : 25 Nov 2010 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Ins...
Case Number: 2010
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2019
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Vicky Sharma Adv. & Parmeet Kaur Adv.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 113 OF 2019Pardeep Kumar Vs The Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and others BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Vicky Sharma, Counsel for ...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date: 18.02.2019First Appeal No.1108/2012In the matter of:Ms. Sharda Gupta14/9, Shakti NagarDelhi-110007:Counsel for the Appellant Sh. R. K. Pathak, Advocate VersusKotak Mahindra Prim...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ritu Sood
Respondant Advocate MAHENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1649/2016( Date of Filing : 24 Aug 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/08/2016 in Case No. C/83/2014 of District Rampur)1. IllyasRampur..............
Case Number: 1649
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2019
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)150-151; COMMUNINTY CENTRE ; C-BLOCK; JANAK PURI; NEW DELHI-110059CASE NO. 680/2015MS. SANGEETAADD-3/147, JANAKPURI,NEW DELHI-110058. …..ComplainantVERSUSTHE MANAGERKOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.ADD-A-3, BLOCK JANAKPURI,NEW DELH...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2019
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Santosh Singh
Respondant Advocate Sanjay Kumar Verma & Mahendra Kumar Mishra
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/288/2017( Date of Filing : 09 Feb 2017 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/09/2016 in Case No. C/67/2005 of District Rae Bareli)1. Kotak Mahindra Bank ...
Case Number: 288
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjay Kumar Verma
Respondant Advocate Santosh Singh & Mahendra Kumar Mishra
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/288/2017( Date of Filing : 09 Feb 2017 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/09/2016 in Case No. C/67/2005 of District Rae Bareli)1. Kotak Mahindra Bank ...
Case Number: 296
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.