
Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance Kotak
Court Name: Central Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/119/2019( Date of Filing : 27 May 2019 )1. BHARAT CHAWLA90 & 91, RAJINDER NAGAR MARKET, NEW DELHI-60............Complainant(s)Versus1. ICICI PRU. LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.ICICI PRULIFE TOWERS, 1089, APPASAHEB MARATHA MARG, PRABHADEVI, MU...
Case Number: 120
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 11-06-2019
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: Kolar
Appelant Advocate B.Kumar
Respondant Advocate
The Complaint is Dismissed as Settled....
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 12-06-2019
Court Name: Pathanamthitta
Appelant Advocate Adv R Gopikrishnan
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumPathanamthittaCDRF Lane, NannuvakkaduPathanamthitta Kerala 689645Complaint Case No. CC/142/2018( Date of Filing : 19 Dec 2018 )1. Abdul Majeed NKavullathil Thekkethil House, Elamannoor P.O., Adoor, Pathanamthitta 691524Pathanamthitta...........Com...
Case Number: 142
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-06-2019
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ASHOK TYAGI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First Appeal No.1321 of 2018Date of the Institution:07.12.2018Date of Decision:23.05.2019Satbir S/o Tilak Ram, resident of Village Hathwala, Tehsil Samalkha, District Panipat. .….Appellant.Versus1. Kotak Mahi...
Case Number: 1321
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M ANIL PRASAD
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONTHIRUVANANTHAPURAMFirst Appeal No. A/16/662( Date of Filing : 15 Oct 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/08/2016 in Case No. CC/142/2015 of District Pathanamthitta)1. M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA OLD MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE LTD7TH FLOOR KOTAK TOWER...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR.PUNEET VERMA,
Respondant Advocate M/S. BSK LEGAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 293 OF 20121. Ms MANISHA GUPTA & 3 ORS.,All R/o Flat No 1-C, Block-5, Pocket-B, Ashok Vihar Phase III,DELHI - 110052.2. M/s Sreyoshi GuptaR/o Flat No 1-C, Block-5, Pocket-B, Ashok Vihar Phase III, NEW DELH...
Case Number: 293
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2019
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate COMPLAINANT IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULAConsumer Complaint No:29 of 2018Date of Institution:09.02.2018Date of Decision:25.04.2019Kumar Vishav Aggarwal son of Sh. Raj Kumar Gupta, R/o House No.152, Sector 4, Panchkula. ….ComplainantVersusKotak Mahin...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2019
Court Name: South Chennai
Appelant Advocate R.Jaya Kumar
Respondant Advocate M/s.Anand abdul and Vinod asst
Date of Filing : 11.03.2011 Date of Order : 24.04.2019DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 3.PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L. : PRESIDENT TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2019
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.S.P.Kala
Respondant Advocate Sh.C.L Uppal
DCDRFKAITHALComplaint Case No. 255/17( Date of Filing : 25 Sep 2017 )1. Mahavir Gora Mundri,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kotak Mahindra InsuranceKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. D.N Arora PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Suman Rana...
Case Number: 255
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2019
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)150-151; COMMUNINTY CENTER ; C-BLOCK; JANAK PURI; NEW DELHICASE NO. 1023/2009Prabahakar Kumar ShawC-29,Sita Puri, Gali No. 2,New Delhi-110059 ..…. ComplainantVERSUS1. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.UGF-I-11, Ground Floor, Ambadeep,1...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.