
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICTADMINISTRATIVE BLDG, NEAR DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (E), MUMBAI-400051Complaint Case No. CC/390/2017( Date of Filing : 29 Sep 2017 )1. MR. SANKET VAGAL.302, ELLORA SSOCIETY SAINT MUKTABAI MARG, VILE PARLE EAST...
Case Number: 390
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2019
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: Chitradurga
Appelant Advocate Sri.P.S. Sathyanarayana Rao
Respondant Advocate
COMPLAINT FILED ON:24/01/2019DISPOSED ON:20/04/2019BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHITRADURGA.CC.NO:54/2019DATED: 20th APRIL 2019PRESENT :- SRI.T.N.SREENIVASAIAH : PRESIDENT B.A., LL.B., SMT. JYOTHI RADHESH JEMBAGIBSc.,MBA., DHA., LADY MEMBER…&he...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2019
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Anup Bhattacharyya
Respondant Advocate Ashfaque Anwar Sanwarwala.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/211/2017( Date of Filing : 17 Feb 2017 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/01/2017 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/35/2017 of District Kolkata-II(Central))1. Shri Suda...
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2019
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Amit Arora
Respondant Advocate Gurmeet Singh Khillon
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 227 of 2017 Date of instt. 18.07.2017 Date of Decision 16.04.2019Krishan son of Shri Jai Bhagwan, resident of House no.1, S.P. Colony, Phooshgarh, District Karnal. …….Complainant V...
Case Number: 227
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2019
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. R.S. Rajain
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/19/33( Date of Filing : 20 Feb 2019 )InComplaint Case No. 559/20171. Smt. Prem W/o Rai Singh s/o Sh. Hira Singh R/o VPO Behlba, Pana Khas, Tehsil Meham District Rohtak............Appel...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 11-04-2019
Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance Kotak
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SHAKTI MEHTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No. 687 of 2018 Date of Institution: 28.12.2018 Date of Decision: 09.04.2019Sukhdeep Kaur wife of late Sh. Kawaljit Singh, resident of House No.184, Gali 27, New Vikas Colony, Karnal, Haryana-1...
Case Number: 687
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2019
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Dildeep Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOTC. C. No. : 18 of 2018Date of Institution: 12.02.2018Date of Decision : 8.04.2019Kuldeep Kaur widow of Nachattar Singh r/o Village Sukhan Wala, District Faridkot. ........ComplainantVersusKotak Mahindra Bank, near HDFC Bank an...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2019
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/26/2018( Date of Filing : 13 Apr 2018 )InComplaint Case No. CC/243/20101. Karan SinghR/o 523,Cheema NagarJalandharPun...
Case Number: 26
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Uday Gosavi
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. FA/12/370( Date of Filing : 21 Aug 2012 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/04/2012 in Case No. cc/11/485 of District Nagpur)1. Kotak mahidra Bank Usha Complex 5 th floor Kings.............
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2019
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anil Kumar Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time and noticing that the matter has already been decided, on merits by District Forum-II, UT, Chandigarh vide order dated 17.09.2018, when we were going to dismiss this complaint, Counsel for the complainant stated that he be allowed to withdraw th...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.