company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 324 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

NCDRC

RAJNISH GUPTA & 3 ORS. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

Respondant Advocate M/S KAPOOR & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2579 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 26/11/2018 in Appeal No. 982/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(NOW HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN )THRUGH THE ESTATE OFF...

Case Number: 2579

|

Date of Filing: 06-12-2019

|

Date of Upload: 09-01-2020

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SANDEEP KWATRA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate VIDUR BHATIA

Respondant Advocate MR.SAMAR VIJAY SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 134 OF 20181. SANDEEP KWATRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through Administrator Sector,14, , Gurgaon-1220012. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough Estate...

Case Number: 134

|

Date of Filing: 15-01-2018

|

Date of Upload: 05-12-2019

Haryana

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S JAI BHAGWAN SHARMA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate NEERAJ SAHNI

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No:132 of 2018Date of Institution:27.07.2018Date of Decision:21.08.2019Jai Bhagwan Sharma, aged 63 years, son of Sh. Sita Ram Sharma, resident of house no.AD-74, HMT, Pinjore, District P...

Case Number: 132

|

Date of Filing: 27-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2019

NCDRC

ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUNDER SINGH

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. BISLA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. NIRVIKAR VERMA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2743 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 10/05/2016 in Appeal No. 1029/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUNDER SINGHS/O. SOHAN LAL, R/O. HOUSE NO. 103, SECTOR 15-A, HISAR,DISTRICT-HISARHARYANA ........

Case Number: 2743

|

Date of Filing: 19-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 31-05-2019

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SURENDER SINGH TAXAK

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VAIBHAV GUPTA

Respondant Advocate MR. SHRESHTH JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 148 OF 2019 IN RP/735/20171. SURENDER SINGH TAXAK...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,PRESIDIN...

Case Number: 148

|

Date of Filing: 07-05-2019

|

Date of Upload: 15-05-2019

Haryana

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT. TRIPTA GOYAL

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate LAVISH ARORA

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULAConsumer Complaint No:299 of 2017Date of Institution:19.12.2017Date of Decision:26.04.2019Smt. Tripta Goyal, aged 44 years, wife of Sh. Sandeep Goyal, resident of H. No. 394, Sector 9, Panchkula, Tehsil and Distt. Pa...

Case Number: 299

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 03-05-2019

Haryana

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DEEP SHIKHA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate LAVISH ARORA

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULAConsumer Complaint No:298 of 2017Date of Institution:19.12.2017Date of Decision:26.04.2019Deep Shikha, aged 29 years, D/o Sh. Prem Bansal, R/o House No.9, Sector 9, Panchkula, Tehsil and District Panchkula. &hellip...

Case Number: 298

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 03-05-2019

Haryana

DR. LATA SANGWAN V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate ARVIND SETH

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.1205 of 2018Date of Institution:23.10.2018 Date of Decision:05.04.2019Haryana Urban Development Authority, through its Estate Officer, Dabra Road, Hisar , Haryana (now HSVP)…..Appellant.Versus...

Case Number: 1205

|

Date of Filing: 23-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 22-04-2019

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT. KRISHNA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. TARUN GUPTA

Respondant Advocate MR. PIYUSH HANS

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 320 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 24/09/2008 in Appeal No. 198/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SMT. KRISHNAR/o. Village Majra Gurdas Tehsil And Distt.RewariHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Vers...

Case Number: 320

|

Date of Filing: 05-02-2009

|

Date of Upload: 13-03-2019

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Ishwar Singh Malik

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Balvinder Singh

Respondant Advocate Gaurav Singh

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Execution No. 16 of 2017Date of instt. 20.04.2017Date of decision: 14.02.2019Ishwar Singh Malik son of Shri Daya Chand resident of house no. 328, Sector-7, Urban Estate Karnal.…………Decree Hold...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2017

|

Date of Upload: 05-03-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.