company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 324 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Ashok Kumar

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Dheeraj Sachdeva

Respondant Advocate Rishi Ram Sharma

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint no. 147 of 2018 Date of Institution:11.06.2018 Date of Decision : 24.11.2021Ashok Kumar son of Sh. Roshan Lal, resident of Kothi No. 464, Sector 15-A, Hisar, District Hisar (Haryana). …&hellip...

Case Number: 147

|

Date of Filing: 11-06-2018

|

Date of Upload: 07-12-2021

Chandigarh

Late Sh. Jatinder Kumar V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHMiscellaneous Application No.In A/RBT/1134/2008:975 of 2019Date of Institution:19.11.2019Date of Decision:07.09.2021Haryana Urban Development Authority, Now HSVP, Plot No.C-3, HUDA Complex, Sector-6, Panchkula, PIN: 134...

Case Number: 975

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 09-09-2021

Haryana

Estate Officer Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Smt.Sunita

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate S.S.Moonak

Respondant Advocate B.P. Singh

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL Execution No.36 of 2019 Date of instt. 13.03.2019 Date of Decision 06.04.2021Smt.Sunita wife of Shri Kawal Sindhwani, resident of VPO Choura, Tehsil Gharaunda, District Karnal. …….DH/Co...

Case Number: 36

|

Date of Filing: 13-03-2019

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2021

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Lajpat Rai Chuchra

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Lajpat Rai Chuchra

Respondant Advocate Rishi Ram Sharma

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Execution Application No.74 of 2021 Date of instt. 08.07.2019 Date of Decision 18.03.2021Lajpat Rai Chuchra (Ex-Serviceman) son of Shri Ladha Ram Chuchra, resident of H.No.963, Sector-6, Urban Estat...

Case Number: 74

|

Date of Filing: 08-07-2019

|

Date of Upload: 24-03-2021

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Rajnish Gupta

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Vineet Kapoor

Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Execution No.14 of 2019 Date of instt. 25.01.2019 Date of Decision 26.11.20201. Rajnish Gupta son of Shri Sat Parkash Gupta;2. Smt.Anju Gupta;3. Neeraj Singla;4. Ankit Singla, all residents of H.No.31-A, Cham...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 25-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2020

NCDRC

RAKESH ARYA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 722 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 29/11/2018 in Complaint No. 404/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS............Appellant(s)Versus1. RAKESH ARYA..............

Case Number: 722

|

Date of Filing: 14-10-2020

|

Date of Upload: 23-11-2020

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Smt. Bindu Bansal

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Vineet Kapoor

Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Execution No.15 of 2020 Date of instt. 25.01.2019 Date of Decision 28.10.20201. Smt.Bindu Bansal wife of Shri Suresh Bansal;2. Suresh Bansal son of Bhagwat Parsad, both residents of H.No.1196, Sector-13, Urba...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 25-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2021

NCDRC

JASWANT SINGH V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHRESTH JAIN

Respondant Advocate MR. HARISH MEHLA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2399 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 02/03/2015 in Appeal No. 96/2014 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINSTRATOR, SECTOR-6,PANCHKULAHARY...

Case Number: 2399

|

Date of Filing: 15-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 30-07-2020

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MOHAN LAL

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHINAV AGNIHOTRI

Respondant Advocate MR. DEEPAK THUKRAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1957 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 10/03/2007 in Appeal No. 1764/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MOHAN LALHouse No. 2A/2, Geeta ColonyDelhi - 110 031...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HARYANA U...

Case Number: 1957

|

Date of Filing: 28-04-2008

|

Date of Upload: 25-02-2020

NCDRC

BINDU BANSAL & ANR. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

Respondant Advocate M/S. KAPOOR & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2580 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 26/11/2018 in Appeal No. 994/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(NOW HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN )THRUGH THE ESTATE OFF...

Case Number: 2580

|

Date of Filing: 06-12-2019

|

Date of Upload: 10-01-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.