company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 324 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

Haryana

Manjit Singh Estate Officer Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Shri Om Sharma

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 301 of 2015 Date of instt.:07.12.2015 Date of decision:15.03.2018Shriom Sharma son of Satyanarayan Dutt House no.786/22, Street no.2, Om Shanti Nagar, Devigarh Road Katihal, Haryana pin code 136027 mobi...

Case Number: 301

|

Date of Filing: 07-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 30-03-2018

NCDRC

GAURAV V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 517 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 22/08/2017 in Appeal No. 373/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.GURGAON ESTATE OFFICER, GURUGAMHARYANA2. HARYANA URBAN...

Case Number: 517

|

Date of Filing: 08-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 23-02-2018

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Smt. Meena Sahni

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate S.K. Malhotra

Respondant Advocate Bhanu Partap Singh

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.15 of 2017 Date of instt. 12.01.2017 Date of decision: 16.2.2018Smt. Meena Sahni, age 70 years, wife of Shri Anil Kumar Sahni, Advocate, resident of House no.4, Minor Road, Karnal. …….Co...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 12-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 23-02-2018

NCDRC

PUSHKAR DUTT SHARMA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. NIRVIKAR VERMA

Respondant Advocate MR. GAJENDER SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3118 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 01/06/2017 in Appeal No. 12/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAT HUDA, SECTOR 13, HISAR HARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Vers...

Case Number: 3118

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2018

NCDRC

JAGDEV SINGH & 5 ORS. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 714 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 08/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1060/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINSTRATOR, SECTOR-6PANCHKULAHARY...

Case Number: 714

|

Date of Filing: 22-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2018

Chandigarh

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Sh. Rajinder Kumar Mahajan

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Amarbir Dhaliwal Adv.

Respondant Advocate

The Accounts Officer of HUDA states that the HUDA has complied with the order and he has placed on record a copy of RE-allotment letter. He further states that the complainant has given a letter that he will not claim Rs.2000/- per day as ordered by this Forum if the house is tra...

Case Number: 217

|

Date of Filing: 17-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 01-02-2018

Haryana

The Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Kapur Singh

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Vinod Dogra

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.420 of 2017 Date of instt. 18.12.2017 Date of decision:4.1.2018Kapur Singh son of Shri Tek Singh, resident of House no.479, Sector-13, Urban Estate, Kurukshetra. …….Complainant. Versus...

Case Number: 420

|

Date of Filing: 18-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 23-01-2018

NCDRC

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S BABLI

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MURARI LAL & MR. AJIT KUMAR EKKA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2010 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 11/08/2016 in Appeal No. 35/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BABLIW/O. SHRI RAJ KUMAR, R/O. VILLAGE HALUWAS, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-BHIWANIHARYANA...........Pet...

Case Number: 2010

|

Date of Filing: 27-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2017

Haryana

Ashok Kumar Boora V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sector-6, Panchkula.

Respondant Advocate Tehsil and District Hisar

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petition No: 114 of 2017 Date of Institution: 21.11.2017 Date of Decision : 22.11.20171. Haryana Urban Development Authority, through its Chief Administrator, Sector-6, Panchkula.2. The Administrator, Har...

Case Number: 114

|

Date of Filing: 21-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2017

NCDRC

VIKAS KUMAR V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHRESHTH JAIN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3314 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 13/03/2015 in Appeal No. 72/2014 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR SECTOR 6, PANCHKULAHAR...

Case Number: 3314

|

Date of Filing: 20-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-11-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.