company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 324 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

NCDRC

TRIPTA SACHDEV V/S HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN ERSTWHILE KNOWN AS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

Respondant Advocate MR. ADITYA BHARDWAJ & MR. ISHWAR SINGH SANGWAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 108 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 02/12/2021 in Appeal No. 847/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN ERSTWHILE KNOWN AS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY............

Case Number: 108

|

Date of Filing: 11-02-2022

|

Date of Upload: 14-11-2022

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S DHARAMPAL

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. K & R LEGAL

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGGARWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 677 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 23/07/2013 in Complaint No. 55/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DHARAMPALS/O. SHRI RAGHBIR SINGH, R/O. H NO. 992, SECTOR-23, SONEPATHARYANA ...........Appellant(s)...

Case Number: 677

|

Date of Filing: 20-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-11-2022

Haryana

USHA DEVI V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate PARVEEN MEHTA

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA Panchkula Date of Instituion:05.09.2022 Date of final hearing:28.10.2022 Date of pronouncement:13.01.2023 APPEAL No.442 of 2022IN THE MATTER OF:1. Haryana Urban Development Authority (Now H.S.V.P), through its Chief Administr...

Case Number: 442

|

Date of Filing: 05-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 30-01-2023

Haryana

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS V/S ASHMA ANSARI

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SATPAL DHAMIJA

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First Appeal No.1241 of 2018Date of the Institution:06.11.2018Date of Final Hearing: 12.09.2022Date of pronouncement: 15.12.2022Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, C-3, HUDA Complex Sector-6, Pa...

Case Number: 304

|

Date of Filing: 02-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2023

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SANJEEV GOYAL

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3298 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 21/10/2015 in Appeal No. 680/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SANJEEV GOYALS/O SH.TARLOCHAN LAL, R/O H.NO-1070,SECTOR-15PANCHKULAHARYANA...........Petitioner...

Case Number: 3298

|

Date of Filing: 29-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 03-03-2022

Chandigarh

Late Sh. Jatinder Kumar V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Umesh Kumar Adv.

Respondant Advocate

State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionU.T., Chandigarh.RA/7/2021 alongwith MA/753/2021Haryana Urban DevelopmentAuthorityVsLate Sh. Jatinder KumarBEFORE:JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENTPADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBERRAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBERPRESENT (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCIN...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 07-10-2021

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2022

Chandigarh

Late Sh. Jatinder Kumar V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Umesh Kumar Adv.

Respondant Advocate

State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionU.T., Chandigarh.RA/7/2021 alongwith MA/753/2021Haryana Urban DevelopmentAuthorityVsLate Sh. Jatinder KumarBEFORE:JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENTPADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBERRAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBERPRESENT (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCIN...

Case Number: 753

|

Date of Filing: 06-10-2021

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2022

Haryana

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY . V/S SMT.INDRA SOBTI.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate DALWAR CHAUDHARY.

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA. Execution Application No.:30 of 2018Date of Institution:24.07.2018Date of Decision:18.01.2018Smt. Indra Sobti, w/o Sh. H.K.Sobti, Sobti Nursing Home, Red Road, Kurukshetra. …….Decree Holder...

Case Number: 30

|

Date of Filing: 24-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 19-01-2022

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S ATUL MARWAHA & 2 ORS.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. FERRY SAFAT

Respondant Advocate MR. PIYUSH HANS

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3960 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1540/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. ATUL MARWAHA & 2 ORS.S/o Sh.N.K Marwha House no-204,Phase III-B-1MOHALIPUNJAB2. Anuj Marwaha,S...

Case Number: 3960

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2022

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. V/S SMT. ANILA GOEL

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MUKESH KUMAR VERMA & MR. ARVIND MISHRA

Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2534 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 07/02/2011 in Appeal No. 1193/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. SMT. ANILA GOELC/o M/s Rocky International, 31,Indrustrial Areas, Rewari, Tehsil RewariHaryan...

Case Number: 2534

|

Date of Filing: 27-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 20-12-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.