
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VIBHAV NARANG
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No. 213 of 2016 Date of the Institution: 09.08.2016 Date of Decision: 18.01.2017Mrs. Arti Jain, R/o W-121, Greater Kailash-II, New Delhi-110048.…..ComplainantVERSUS1. M/s EMAAR MGF Land Limited...
Case Number: 213
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LAWYERS INC.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 784 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 12/05/2016 in Complaint No. 135/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE SHRI RAJENDRA KUMAR, ECE HOUSE, 28, KASTURB...
Case Number: 784
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to approach the proper Fora on the same cause of action. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the par...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Varun Katyal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:499 of 2016Date of Institution:23.08.2016Date of Decision:16.01.2017Gurpreet Gill w/o Jaswinder Gill, resident of 37, Blue Bonnet Driver, Brampton, Ontario, L6Y 4N3 Canada through its Special Power of...
Case Number: 499
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ajiteshwar Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:603 of 2016Date of Institution:19.09.2016Date of Decision:16.01.2017Jashinder Bir Singh son of Sh. Tarlochan Singh, r/o # 1592, Sector 69, Mohali.Rajesh Singhal son of Sh. Dev Raj Singhal, r/o # 2058,...
Case Number: 603
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jagpal Singh Dhupar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. On submitting one photocop...
Case Number: 176
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.S.Chadha Adv.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.517 OF 2015Dr. Saroj Saini Vs M.D. Emaar MGF Land Ltd. and Anr. BEFORE: HON’BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN PRESIDENT HON’BLE MRS. PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBER HON’BLE MR. RAVINDER SINGH, MEMBE...
Case Number: 517
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:321 of 2016Date of Institution:05.07.2016Date of Decision:12.01.2017Mr.Sukhminder Singh s/o S. Jagir Singh, House No.2010, Sector 15-C, Chandigarh.Now at :House No.2155, Old Sunny Enclave, Sector 125,...
Case Number: 321
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amardeep Singh Walia,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is admitted by Counsel for the Decree Holders that the Judgment Debtors gone in appeal i.e. bearing No.1321 of 2016, in which, operation of the order has been stayed by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi. Faced with the aforesaid situati...
Case Number: 155
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kunal Garg
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the competent Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties free of charge...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.