
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paramjit Batta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the Decree Holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the o...
Case Number: 158
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ram Krishan Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In view of order dated 02.12.2016 passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.1483 of 2016, whereby order dated 03.10.2016 passed by this Commission in Complaint No.349 of 2016, has been stayed subject to deposit depositing ...
Case Number: 178
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LEX INDIS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1954 OF 20161. KAPIL NATH MEHROTRA & ANR.388, NARMADA APARTMENT, ALAKNANDA, NEW DELHI-1100192. MRS. RENU MEHROTRA.388, NARMADA APARTMENT, ALAKNANDA, NEW DELHI-110019...........Complainant(s)Versus1. EMAAR ...
Case Number: 1954
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:334 of 2016Date of Institution:06.07.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Manjit Kaur w/o Late B.S.Sandhu, r/o H.No.645, Sector 29-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sEmaar MGF Land Limited,...
Case Number: 334
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:335 of 2016Date of Institution:06.07.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Lakhvinder Singh Bhullar, s/o Sadhu Singh, H.No.1534, Sector 18-D, Chandigarh.Col. Shiv Dayal Singh s/o Late Piara Singh, H.No.5779-...
Case Number: 335
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:280 of 2016Date of Institution:21.06.2016Date of Decision:28.12.2016Ajay Bansal s/o Late Sh. Madan Lal Bansal, r/o A-1/501, Printers Apartment, Plot – 18, Sector 13, Rohini, New Delhi-110085.&he...
Case Number: 280
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mukand Gupta & Geeta Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:429 of 2016Date of Institution:05.08.2016Date of Decision:28.12.2016Krishan Lal Manchanda son of Babu Ram, resident of House No.369, Sector 7, Panchkula.Ms. Vinod Manchanda wife of Krishan Lal Manchan...
Case Number: 429
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P L Garg, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the Decree Holder wishes to withdraw this Execution Application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the Execution Application is dismissed as withdrawn. On submitting photocopy ...
Case Number: 171
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:347 of 2016Date of Institution:12.07.2016Date of Decision:15.12.2016Shiv Kumar Sawhney s/o Sh. Jagindernath Sawhney, resident of H.No.4132, Ground Floor, Customs and Central Excise Colony, Sector 37-C...
Case Number: 347
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Capt. Arun Sharma , Ranbir Singh, adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:248 of 2016Date of Institution:31.05.2016Date of Decision:15.12.2016Amarjit Singh Mahal aged 55 years son of Sh. Labh Singh Mahal.Mrs. Lakhmir Kaur, aged 50 years wife of Sh. Amarjit Singh Mahal.Both ...
Case Number: 248
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.