
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shivendra Singh Tanwar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
On 09.02.2017, none put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and the matter was adjourned to 01.03.2017 for arguments. On the said date, again none appeared on behalf of the complainant and in the interest of justice, the matter was adjourned to today. Called third time at ...
Case Number: 822
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
It is stated that the decree holders and also the Judgment Debtors have gone in appeal before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi against the order dated 15.12.2016. It is further stated that let this execution application ordered to be dism...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D.S. Soundh Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:398 of 2016Date of Institution:26.07.2016Date of Decision:28.02.2017Rakesh Aggarwal s/o Sh. Ved Parkash Aggarwal c/o House No.884, Sector 21, Panchkula.Ms. Mani Mukhija w/o Sh. Rakesh Aggarwal, c/o Ho...
Case Number: 398
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D.S. Soundh Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:399 of 2016Date of Institution:26.07.2016Date of Decision:28.02.2017Mr. Mukesh Aggarwal s/o Sh. Ved Parkash Aggarwal c/o House No.884, Sector 21, Panchkula.Ms. Pooja w/o Sh. Mukesh Aggarwal, c/o House...
Case Number: 399
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.s.Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.688 of 2016Date of Institution14.10.2016Date of Decision27.02.2017Arvind Batra s/o Late Sh. M. R. Batra R/o J-152, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi.Saru Batra w/o Sh. Arvind Batra R/o J-152, Sar...
Case Number: 688
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one before competent Consumer Fora or any other legal Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order...
Case Number: 159
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.M. Mahajan father and GPA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/161/20171. Varun MahajanChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Emaar MGF Land Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER For the Compla...
Case Number: 161
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Pankaj Chandgothia
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/129/20161. Mr. Parvesh Ahuja s/o Late Sh. D.R. .Ahuja, H. NO. 402, 1st Floor, Sector 30 A, Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Emaar MGF Land Pvt. Ltd.SCO 120-122, First Floor, Se...
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:380 of 2016Date of Institution:22.07.2016Date of Decision:21.02.2017Mulkeet Singh s/o S. Dilip Singh r/o H.No.4704, R-Block, AWHO Flats, Sector 68, Darshan Vihar, Mohali – 160062.…&hellip...
Case Number: 380
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rakesh Bajaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:443 of 2016Date of Institution:09.08.2016Date of Decision:21.02.2017Malikat Singh son of Sh. Bhag Singh, resident of H.No.256, Sector 45-A, Chandigarh and now at #4051, Sector 68, SAS Nagar, Punjab.&h...
Case Number: 443
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-02-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.