
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Yogesh Jain, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ajiteshwar Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:601 of 2016Date of Institution:19.09.2016Date of Decision:06.02.2017Manjit Singh s/o Late Sh. Gurbhej Singh.Harminder Kaur w/o Manjit Singh.Both residing at D-126, Ranjit Avenue, Defence Colony, Amrit...
Case Number: 601
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.S.Jagdeva, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ajiteshwar Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:627 of 2016Date of Institution:22.09.2016Date of Decision:03.02.2017Nita Dhawan w/o Pardeep Dhawan r/o 126, Model Town Ambala City, Haryana.……ComplainantV e r s u sEmaar MGF Pvt. Ltd., t...
Case Number: 627
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, the decree holders wish to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. On submitting one photocopy of complete...
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ajiteshwar Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:617 of 2016Date of Institution:22.09.2016Date of Decision:31.01.2017R. Kesavan s/o Sh. Rangachari N., r/o flat No.702, Jasmine Regency Garden, Plot No.10, Sector 6, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra....
Case Number: 617
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1322 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 31/08/2016 in Complaint No. 242/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/10642/2016,IA/11199/20161. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, S.C...
Case Number: 1322
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Punjab State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Dakshan Marg, Sector 37-A , ChandigarhExecution Application No. EA/22/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/11/1031. Subash MittalSubash Mittal s/o Surinder Kumar Mittal, r/o Fairview Tower,Appt. 11A,40-Sukhumvit soi-18,Bangkok-10110-Thail...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 25-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-03-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajvir Singh Sihag
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/745/20161. Prem Prakash Malhotras/o G.D. Malhotra r/o GHS-27, Flat No. 110, Sector 5, MDC, Panchkula.2. Mrs. Uma Malhotra w/o Prem Prakash Malhotra r/o GHS-27, Flat No. 110, Sector 5, MDC, Pan...
Case Number: 745
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Mankotia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:397 of 2016Date of Institution:26.07.2016Date of Decision:18.01.2017Sumeet Rana s/o Sh. B.S.Rana, c/o VPO Babehar, Tehsil AMB, Distt. Una, Himachal Pradesh.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s Em...
Case Number: 397
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Mankotia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:449 of 2016Date of Institution:10.08.2016Date of Decision:18.01.2017Amit Rana s/o Sh. B.S.Rana, c/o VPO Daulat Pur Chowk, Tehsil AMB, Distt. Una, Himachal Pradesh.……ComplainantV e r s u ...
Case Number: 449
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Mankotia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:450 of 2016Date of Institution:10.08.2016Date of Decision:18.01.2017Amit Rana s/o Sh. B.S.Rana, c/o VPO Daulat Pur Chowk, Tehsil AMB, Distt. Una, Himachal Pradesh.……ComplainantV e r s u ...
Case Number: 450
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.