
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhinay Sharma, Nevadita Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed by the decree holder(s)/complainant(s) to execute an order dated 12.07.2018 passed by this Commission in Consumer Complaint No.839 of 2017. As per record available, against the aforesaid order, the judgment debtors/Opposite Parties...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajiv K. Bhatia Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:264 of 2018Date of Institution:13.06.2018Date of Decision:29.01.2019Rajesh Kumar Sudera, R/o 415-417, St.Saviours Road, Leicester, Le54hh UK, presently residing at #710, New Kidwai Nagar, Ludhiana, Pu...
Case Number: 264
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In view of conditional stay granted by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.2213 of 2018, Counsel for the decree holder(s) wishes to withdraw this execution application at this stage with liberty to file it again, if need b...
Case Number: 349
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In view of conditional stay granted by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.2214 of 2018, Counsel for the decree holder(s) wishes to withdraw this execution application at this stage with liberty to file it again, if need b...
Case Number: 350
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In view of conditional stay granted by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.2215 of 2018, Counsel for the decree holder(s) wishes to withdraw this execution application at this stage with liberty to file it again, if need b...
Case Number: 351
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In view of conditional stay granted by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.2212 of 2018, Counsel for the decree holder(s) wishes to withdraw this execution application at this stage with liberty to file it again, if need b...
Case Number: 352
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
ORDER Today, in Court, Sh. Sanjeet Kumar, Senior Executive (Legal) of the judgment debtors has handed over a demand draft bearing No.002033 dated 16.11.2018 in the sum of Rs.72,21,272/- to the Counsel for the decree holder against receipt. Photocopy of the aforesaid draft is ret...
Case Number: 337
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-01-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate LINK LEGAL INDIA LAW SERVICES
Respondant Advocate MR. NERUSU SRINIVASA RAO, AVS RAJU & CH. L. SARVESWAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1427 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 26/04/2017 in Appeal No. 253/2016 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M/S. EMAAR HILLS TOWNSHIP PRIVATE LIMITEDREPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI S. ...
Case Number: 1427
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN,MS. ANUSHREE NARAIN, MR. ARNAV NARAIN, MR. MISHRA RAJ SHEKHAR & MR. GAURAV SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. NERUSU SRINIVASA RAO, AVS RAJU & CH. L. SARVESWAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1427 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 26/04/2017 in Appeal No. 253/2016 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M/S. EMAAR HILLS TOWNSHIP PRIVATE LIMITEDREPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI S. ...
Case Number: 2244
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vishal Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, it transpires that the judgment debtors fully satisfied the claim of the decree holders by paying an amount of Rs.1.77 Lakhs. We are of the opinion that the said amount satisfies the claim of the decree holders. At the time of arguments, Counsel for the ...
Case Number: 319
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.