
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:180 of 2018Date of Institution:24.04.2018Date of Decision:08.10.2018Mr. Deepak Mehra s/o Mr.S.L.Mehra, resident of Flat No.D-4, Ground Floor, Uppal Marble Arch, Manimajra, Chandigarh, U.T.Ms.Sonal Meh...
Case Number: 180
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. THAKUR SUMIT, MR. SHUBHANKAR SENGUPTA & MS. YASHMEET KAUR & MS. MAANSI SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. GIAN CHAND GARG
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 209 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/01/2012 in Complaint No. 52/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED AND ANR.SCO 120 122, First Floor, Sector 17C, ChandigarhPunjab2. EMAAR MG...
Case Number: 209
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. THAKUR SUMIT, MR. SHUBHANKAR SENGUPTA, MS. YASHMEER KAUR & MS. MAANSI SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. GIAN CHAND GARG
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 209 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/01/2012 in Complaint No. 52/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED AND ANR.SCO 120 122, First Floor, Sector 17C, ChandigarhPunjab2. EMAAR MG...
Case Number: 210
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. THAKUR SUMIT, MR. SHUBHANKAR SENGUPTA, MS. YASHMEET KAUR & MS. MAANSI SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. GIAN CHAND GARG
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 209 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/01/2012 in Complaint No. 52/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED AND ANR.SCO 120 122, First Floor, Sector 17C, ChandigarhPunjab2. EMAAR MG...
Case Number: 213
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parminder Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Sh. Parminder Singh, Advocate, Counsel for the decree holder that against order under execution, the judgment debtors went in First Appeal bearing No.1242 of 2018 before the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi and vide order da...
Case Number: 261
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sud, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Shobit Phutela, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:15 of 2018Date of Institution:10.01.2018Date of Decision:20.09.2018Shelja Sehgal wife of Mr.Kanav Sehgal resident of 19 Copymoor Close, Northampton (UK) through her General Power of Attorney Mrs. Pooj...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:4 of 2018Date of Institution:04.01.2018Date of Decision:20.09.2018Satwant Singh S/o Sh.Sampooran Singh, r/o H.No.721, Sector 11B, Chandigarh.Dipinder Singh Locham S/o Sh.Satwant Singh r/o H.No.721, Se...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:47 of 2018Date of Institution:02.02.2018Date of Decision:20.09.2018Rajinder Kumar s/o Sh.Mangat Rai r/o #230/1, Sector 1B, Vikas Nagar, Mandi Gobindgarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sEmaar MGF...
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:48 of 2018Date of Institution:02.02.2018Date of Decision:20.09.2018Mangat Rai S/o Sh.Hari Ram r/o #230/1, Sector 1B, Vikas Nagar, Mandi Gobindgarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sEmaar MGF Land ...
Case Number: 48
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:60 of 2018Date of Institution:09.02.2018Date of Decision:20.09.2018Padma Rani W/o Sh.Mangat Rai r/o #230/1, Sector 1B, Vikas Nagar, Mandi Gobindgarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sEmaar MGF Lan...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.