
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Khunger
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH. Consumer Complaint No.1001 of 2018 Date of institution : 20.12.2018 Date of decision : 08.04.20191. Dr. Mudit Kumar son of Sh. Surendra Sahai Srivastava;2. Dr. Monika Schadeva wife of Dr. Mudit Kumar; Both residen...
Case Number: 1001
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate I.Arokiasamy-Compt.,
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/170/2017( Date of Filing : 30 Jun 2017 )1. Thameem NishaNo. 5, Manikanda Mudali Street, 6th Lane Old Wahermenpet, Chennai-21...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s. Emaar MGP Land Ltd., Rep by its Chairman & M.D., & anrNo. 28, Kasturba Gandhi M...
Case Number: 170
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-06-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate BHUPINDER SINGH WALIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No. 184 of 2018 Date of the Institution: 21.03.2018 Date of Decision: 19.03.2019Ravinder Kumar Saraogi son of Shri Kedar Mal Saraogi, resident of Maharana Pratap Chowk, W. No. 3, Sadualpur, Dist...
Case Number: 184
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P.K. Kukreja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER In view of order dated 24.01.2019 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi in C.P.No.IB-1403(PB)/2018 in the case titled as Neeraj Gupta Vs. EMMAR MGF Land Ltd., this complaint is returned to the complainant(s) with liberty to file it again as...
Case Number: 480
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sud & Parminder Kaur Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER In view of order dated 24.01.2019 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi in C.P.No.IB-1403(PB)/2018 in the case titled as Neeraj Gupta Vs. EMMAR MGF Land Ltd., this execution application is returned to the decree holder/complainant with libe...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shivendra Singh Tanwar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
ORDER This complaint has been filed against the Company, namely, EMMAR MGF Land Private Ltd. and its Managing Director/Director(s) under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with a prayer to refund the amount alongwith interest, compensation & litigation expenses ...
Case Number: 822
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajiv K. Bhatia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
This complaint has been filed against the Company, namely, EMMAR MGF Land Ltd. and its Managing Director/Director(s) under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with a prayer to refund the amount alongwith interest, compensation & litigation expenses for deficiency ...
Case Number: 170
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Bishnoi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
This complaint has been filed against the Company, namely, EMMAR MGF Land Ltd. and its Managing Director/Director(s) under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with a prayer to refund the amount alongwith interest, compensation & litigation expenses for deficiency ...
Case Number: 329
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P.K. Kukreja, Devinder Kumar & Anshul Kukreja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/35/2019( Date of Filing : 18 Feb 2019 )1. Jasjeet SinghSon of Shri Harbans Singh resident of House No. 97, Sector 71,S.A.S Nagar............Complainant(s)Versus1. Emaar MGF Land Ltdthrough its Incharge...
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 18-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Shobit Phutela, Adv.
This complaint has been filed against the Company, namely, EMMAR MGF Land Ltd. and its Managing Director/Director(s) under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with a prayer to refund the amount alongwith interest, compensation & litigation expenses for deficiency ...
Case Number: 392
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.