company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PONNAMMA K.K.

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. OM PRAKASH JALAN

Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1152 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 02/02/2017 in Appeal No. 114/2014 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. PONNAMMA K.K.D/O. SRI KRISHNAN 3/194, VIPUL KHAND, GOMTINAGAR LUCKNOW-226010UTTAR PRADESH...

Case Number: 1152

|

Date of Filing: 01-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2019

West Bengal

Asit Hazri V/S Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ms. Supriya Dubey

Respondant Advocate Mr. Amal Kr. Roy. Ms. Moumita Dey.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. FA/551/2014( Date of Filing : 14 May 2014 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/03/2014 in Case No. CC/327/2012 of District Kolkata-II(Central))1. Insurance Regulatory and D...

Case Number: 551

|

Date of Filing: 14-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2019

NCDRC

SHOBHIT GUPTA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DHRUV TAMTA

Respondant Advocate MR P.D GUPTA, G.C. RAWAL & AKLA JOSHI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1879 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 29/05/2017 in Complaint No. 66/2016 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SDAN. INA.NEW DELHI-110023...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SHOBHIT G...

Case Number: 1879

|

Date of Filing: 12-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 25-06-2019

Uttar Pradesh

Pyareylal V/S Bulandshahr Khurja Development Authority (B.K.D.A.)

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Amit Jaiswal

Respondant Advocate Sanjay Kumar Verma

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/491/2019( Date of Filing : 10 Apr 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/02/2019 in Case No. C/128/2015 of District Bulandshahr)1. Bulandshahr Khurja...

Case Number: 491

|

Date of Filing: 10-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 29-07-2019

Uttar Pradesh

Allahabad Development Authority and Another V/S Smt. Chandra Kali and Others

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate A P Sharma

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/134/2019( Date of Filing : 10 Jun 2019 )InEX/89/20141. Smt. Chandra Kali and OthersAllahabadAllahabadup...........Appellant(s)Versus...

Case Number: 134

|

Date of Filing: 10-06-2019

|

Date of Upload: 13-06-2019

Uttar Pradesh

The Secretary Lucknow Development Authority V/S Onkar Nath Singh

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Jai Prakas Rai

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/79/2019( Date of Filing : 19 Mar 2019 )1. Onkar Nath SinghS/O Shri Shiv Shanker Singh R/O A13/35-10A/Bjij Enclave Varanasi 221005...........Com...

Case Number: 79

|

Date of Filing: 19-03-2019

|

Date of Upload: 25-06-2019

Uttar Pradesh

Dr. Smt. Vibha Sareen V/S Mathura vrindavan development authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate N C Uppadhaya

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1747/2018( Date of Filing : 01 Oct 2018 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/08/2018 in Case No. C/137/2013 of District Mathura)1. Mathura vrindavan dev...

Case Number: 1747

|

Date of Filing: 01-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 21-06-2019

NCDRC

AMANJOT GURBANS SINGH V/S GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA)

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR

Respondant Advocate M/S. SKV ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 249 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 27/04/2017 in Complaint No. 114/2016 of the State Commission Punjab)1. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA)THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER. ...........Appellant(s...

Case Number: 249

|

Date of Filing: 08-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 24-05-2019

NCDRC

ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUNDER SINGH

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. BISLA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. NIRVIKAR VERMA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2743 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 10/05/2016 in Appeal No. 1029/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUNDER SINGHS/O. SOHAN LAL, R/O. HOUSE NO. 103, SECTOR 15-A, HISAR,DISTRICT-HISARHARYANA ........

Case Number: 2743

|

Date of Filing: 19-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 31-05-2019

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SURENDER SINGH TAXAK

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VAIBHAV GUPTA

Respondant Advocate MR. SHRESHTH JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 148 OF 2019 IN RP/735/20171. SURENDER SINGH TAXAK...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,PRESIDIN...

Case Number: 148

|

Date of Filing: 07-05-2019

|

Date of Upload: 15-05-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.