company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Uttar Pradesh

Baldev Singh V/S Lucknow Development Authority

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.N. Tiwari

Respondant Advocate Mujeeb Effendi

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. RP/79/2019( Date of Filing : 22 Aug 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/08/2019 in Case No. EX/24/2005 of District Lucknow-I)1. Lucknow Develop...

Case Number: 79

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2019

|

Date of Upload: 11-11-2019

Uttar Pradesh

Altaf Ahmad V/S Lucknow Development Authority

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.N. Tiwari

Respondant Advocate Mujeeb Effendi

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. RP/80/2019( Date of Filing : 22 Aug 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/08/2019 in Case No. EX/34/2016 of District Lucknow-I)1. Lucknow Develop...

Case Number: 80

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2019

|

Date of Upload: 11-11-2019

Uttar Pradesh

Mahboob Ali V/S Lucknow Development Authority

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.N. Tiwari

Respondant Advocate Mujeeb Effendi

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. RP/81/2019( Date of Filing : 22 Aug 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/08/2019 in Case No. EX/25/2005 of District Lucknow-I)1. Lucknow Develop...

Case Number: 81

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2019

|

Date of Upload: 11-11-2019

Uttar Pradesh

Mohd Haseer V/S Lucknow Development Authority

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.N. Tiwari

Respondant Advocate Mujeeb Effendi

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. RP/82/2019( Date of Filing : 22 Aug 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/08/2019 in Case No. EX/23/2005 of District Lucknow-I)1. Lucknow Develop...

Case Number: 82

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2019

|

Date of Upload: 11-11-2019

Uttar Pradesh

Eqtidar Ahmad V/S Lucknow Development Authority

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.N. Tiwari

Respondant Advocate Mujeeb Effendi

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. RP/83/2019( Date of Filing : 22 Aug 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/08/2019 in Case No. EX/33/2016 of District Lucknow-I)1. Lucknow Develop...

Case Number: 83

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2019

|

Date of Upload: 11-11-2019

Rajasthan

Sudhir Bardiya s/o Lat. Sardar Mal Bardiya V/S Secretary Jaipur Development Authority

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate R.P.Gupta

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO: 721/2019Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, JLN Marg, Jaipur through Dy.Commissioner Zone 4Vs.Sudhir Bardia s/o Late Sardarmal Bardia, Shop No. 72, Johari Bazar, Jaipur.Date of Orde...

Case Number: 721

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2019

|

Date of Upload: 04-09-2019

NCDRC

ROOP CHAND SONI V/S SECRETARY, JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR & MS. HARSHA VINOY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1611 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 12/03/2018 in Appeal No. 1308/2017 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. SECRETARY, JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU ROAD, JAIPURRAJASTHAN2. THE ...

Case Number: 1611

|

Date of Filing: 30-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 30-08-2019

Rajasthan

Jaipur Development Authority Through Commissioner V/S Raghunath Prasad Meena s/o Gopilal Meena

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Anurag Kulshresthat

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1COMPLAINT CASE NO; 111/ 2017Raghunath Prasad Meena s/o Gopilal Meena r.o Saket Colony, Behind Govt. Hospital, Hindaun city Distt. Karauli. Vs.Jaipur Development Authority, Ram Kishore Vyas Bhawan, JLN Ma...

Case Number: 111

|

Date of Filing: 27-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 09-09-2019

Haryana

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S JAI BHAGWAN SHARMA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate NEERAJ SAHNI

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No:132 of 2018Date of Institution:27.07.2018Date of Decision:21.08.2019Jai Bhagwan Sharma, aged 63 years, son of Sh. Sita Ram Sharma, resident of house no.AD-74, HMT, Pinjore, District P...

Case Number: 132

|

Date of Filing: 27-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2019

NCDRC

NATH BUX SINGH V/S AYODHYA FAIZABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. R.K. SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 799 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 14/12/2017 in Appeal No. 1473/2012 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. AYODHYA FAIZABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, LOYD GATE CHOWK, FAIZABA...

Case Number: 799

|

Date of Filing: 09-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.