
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 168 OF 2014 IN CC/235/20141. DR. UTTAMKUMAR SAMANTA,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/s BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED & 3 ORS.,...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING ...
Case Number: 168
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 235 OF 20141. DR. UTTAMKUMAR SAMANTA,C/o Dr. Sachindranath Paul, Monikuthir, Flat F/2B, Bhatrapally, PO Nabapally, Barasat,KOLKATA - 700126............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED & 3 O...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 95 OF 20141. Smt. CHEKURI SREE DEVI & ANR.,W/o Shri Veda Murthy, Flat No. 501, 5th Floor, Devireddy Paradise Apartments, 4th Lane, Devapuram,GUNTUR - 522007............Complainant(s)Versus1. CHAIRMAN , M/s...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2014
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCENTRAL MUMBAI DISTRICTComplaint Case No. CC/13/1551. SHRI SURYAKANT NAMDEO BAGAL204, Shivkrupa TCH Society, 9, Jakeria Bunder Road, Cottongreen, Mumbai-400 033Maharashtra ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE HEAD, CUSTOMER CARE, BHARTI ...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KANISHK AGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 244 OF 2014 IN RP/3293/20131. SIDHARTH KHANDELWAL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. BHARTI AIRTEL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MRS....
Case Number: 244
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-05-2014
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KANISHK AGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3293 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 20/05/2013 in Appeal No. 819/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SIDHARTH KHANDELWALD-2/1,OKHLA INDUSTRIAL AREA, NEW DELHI --110020...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 3293
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BRIJENDER SINGH DHULL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 702 OF 2013 IN RP/1991/20131. MANJIT SINGH BAL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR...
Case Number: 702
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-02-2014
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/13/763( Date of Filing : 23 Dec 2013 )1. Rup Dipak MallickSri Kamakshya Apartment, 509, Jodhpur Park, Kolkata-700068.......
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2023
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/13/25821. ALIF GRANITES PVT LTD.A Company Registered Under the Companies Act 1956 having its registered Office a...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharti Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharti Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharti Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.