
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH CHAHAR
Respondant Advocate MS. SANJANA J. BALI & MS. SHWETA KAPOOR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 324 OF 2013 IN RP/190/20121. RAMESH KUMAR ROHILLA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE M...
Case Number: 324
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. B.K. MAHIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2278 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 31/12/2012 in Appeal No. 878/2012 of the State Commission Kerala)1. HARISS/O A.K ABDUL KHADER, PROPRIETOR , AIM DISTRIBUTORS, CPXV/281 G. CHAMABALAM ROAD, BERKA P.O...
Case Number: 2278
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ROHIT JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2785 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 26/04/2013 in Appeal No. 12/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/4780/2013,IA/4781/20131. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.AIRTEL CENTRE GURGAON, UDYOG VIHAR , PHASE-IVGUR...
Case Number: 2785
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KG GOPALAKRISHNAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2981 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 09/07/2013 in Appeal No. 122/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.PRESENTLY ADD: AIRTEL CENTRE,, 2ND FLOOR, PLOT NO-16, UDYOG VIHAR, PHASE-IV, GU...
Case Number: 2981
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KG GOPALAKRISHNAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2982 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 09/07/2013 in Appeal No. 123/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.PRESENTLY AT: AIRTEL CENTRE, 2ND FLOOR PLOT NO 16, UDYOG VIHAR, PHASE-IV, GURGA...
Case Number: 2982
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMAR SINGH (AUTH. REP.)
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1321 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 31/01/2013 in Appeal No. 38/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)1. KUSUM LATAW/O LATE SHRI AMAR SINGH, R/O PLOT NO-39/B-1 UNDER BRIDGE ROAD, INDUSTRIL AREA, RAJPURA...
Case Number: 1321
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2013
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 606 of 2012 1. Shivani Bisht ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Bharti Airtel ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated ...
Case Number: 606
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2592 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 18/05/2010 in Appeal No. 845/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.D-184,Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-INew Delhi-110020Delhi...........Petitioner(...
Case Number: 2592
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 03-07-2013
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 122 of 2013 1. Vivek High SchoolSector 38-B, Chandigarh, through its Administrator Mrs. Sheila Mamik ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : ...
Case Number: 122
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 833 of 2012 1. Malvinder SinghQuite No. 3, Ground Floor, Sector 35-A, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Bharti Airtel LTd.Circular Office, Plot No. 21, Rajiv Gandhi Technology Park, Chandigarh through its Manager/...
Case Number: 833
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharti Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharti Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharti Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.