
Bank Of India Bank Of India Central Bank Of India Central Bank Of India Telegraph
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV. JOSHI
Respondant Advocate ADV. CHARI
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. MA/509/08(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. TELEGRAPH OFFICEAKOLA BEFORE: Hon'ble Mr.S.M. ...
Case Number: 509
|
Date of Filing: 24-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.B.Rama Krishna, 16-11-310/6/3/A
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/34/20111. 1.K.Vijaya Kumar, R/o.H.No.12-2-39/4,Sriramanagar Colony,Mehdipatnam, Hyerabad-28.2. 2.Smt.K.Rajani, W/o.K.Vijaya Kumar,H.no.12-2-39/4,Sriramnagar Colony, MehdipatnamHyderabad-28...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Telegraph Traffic Employees Co-Opera...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.B.Rama Krishna, 16-11-310/6/3/A
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/34/20111. 1.K.Vijaya Kumar, R/o.H.No.12-2-39/4,Sriramanagar Colony,Mehdipatnam, Hyerabad-28.2. 2.Smt.K.Rajani, W/o.K.Vijaya Kumar,H.no.12-2-39/4,Sriramnagar Colony, MehdipatnamHyderabad-28...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Telegraph Traffic Employees Co-Opera...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Hyderabad-III
Appelant Advocate M/S R.Michael Vijay Raj
Respondant Advocate Smt. P. Sudha
Case Number: 375
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 17-06-2022
Court Name: Hyderabad-III
Appelant Advocate M.Madhava Reddy
Respondant Advocate Smt.P.Sudha
Case Number: 778
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 17-06-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s K.Padmanabha Chary
Respondant Advocate Mr.N.Rajeshwar rap
Complaint Case No. CC/10/20101. Sri.Shivaraj w/o Girglani R/o.H.No.8-2-309/7/2, Plot No.301, Banjarahills, Road No.14, Hyderabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Telegraph Traffic employees Co.Ope. Credit Society Ltd., Rep. by personal incharge, Spl. Officer C/o Central Teleg...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s K.Padmanabha Chary
Respondant Advocate Mr.N.Rajeshwar rap
Complaint Case No. CC/10/20101. Sri.Shivaraj w/o Girglani R/o.H.No.8-2-309/7/2, Plot No.301, Banjarahills, Road No.14, Hyderabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Telegraph Traffic employees Co.Ope. Credit Society Ltd., Rep. by personal incharge, Spl. Officer C/o Central Teleg...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.Rajeshwar Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s. P.Umapathi Rao
First Appeal No. FA/1178/09(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/10/2009 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/47/09 of District Hyderabad-II)1. The Special Officer-Incharge, Now rep. by the Chairman Person in Charge Committee, Telegraph Traffic Employees Co-op. Credit Society Ltd.DTO., Resi...
Case Number: 1178
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.Rajeshwar Rao
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/1179/09(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/10/2009 in Case No. CC.70/2009 of District Hyderabad-II)1. The Special Officer-In-Charge now rep. by the Chairman, Person in Charge Committee , Telegraph Traffic Emplyees Co-op. Credit Society Ltd.DTO, Residency Building (O...
Case Number: 1179
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.B.Raheswar Rao
Respondant Advocate Mr.B.,Ramakrishna
First Appeal No. fa/828/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)1. Telegraph Traffic Employee,C0-operative credit Society, Rep by its persons in charge committee, D.T.O.Koti, Hyderabad, BEFORE:HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERBEFOR...
Case Number: 828
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Telegraph in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Telegraph ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Telegraph under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.