Telegraph
Latest Judgments
Total 112 Consumer Court Cases Against Telegraph.
Post and Telegraph Employees Co Operative, V/S Metlapalli Satyavani,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.V.Gouri Shankara Rao,
Respondant Advocate M/s. K.Sarva Bhowma Rao
Case Number: 480
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2017
Post and Telegraph Employee Co operation House Building Society Ltd., V/S Metlapalli Satyavani
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.V.Gouri Shankara Rao
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 479
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2017
Telegraph Traffic Employees Co Operative Credit Society, V/S 1. K. Vijaya Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vijay Kumar
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaExecution Application No. EA/1/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/34/20111. 1. K. Vijaya KumarR/o H.No 12-2-39/4, Sriramnagar Colony, Mehidipatnam, Hyderabad 282. 2. Smt. K. RajaniW/o K. Vijaya Kumar , R/o H.No 12-2-39/4, Sriramnagar Colon...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2016
The Telegraph Traffic Employees Co operative Credit Soiety Ltd., V/S Mohammed Abdul Waheed
Court Name: Hyderabad-II
Appelant Advocate M/s. M. Madhava Reddy
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2016
CHIEF POST MASTER GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF POST & TELEGRAPH V/S USHA MISHRA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. DEEPA CHACKO (AMICUS CURIAE )
Respondant Advocate DR. UDAY VEER SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 152 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 30/04/2010 in Complaint No. 43/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. USHA MISHRAA-1177,Indira NagarLucknowUttar Pradesh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. CHIEF POST ...
Case Number: 152
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2016
Chief Postmaster, Post and Telegraph Department G.P.O, patna and Anothers, V/S Dhananjay Kumar,
Court Name: Patna
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMPATNA, BIHARComplaint Case No. CC/190/2011( Date of Filing : 06 Jul 2011 )1. Dhananjay Kumar, S/o- Late Sitanandan Sharma, R/o- Vill- Post - Eachhos, PS- Islampur, Distt- Nalanda,...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Chief Postmaster, Post and Telegraph Departm...
Case Number: 190
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2021
The Superintendent, Post & Telegraph Dept. V/S Sri Sushil Kr. Das
Court Name: Cooch Behar
Appelant Advocate Mr. Tanumay Kar
Respondant Advocate Mr. Nitai Ch. Dey
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumB. S. Road, Cooch BeharPh. No.230696, 222023Complaint Case No. CC/34/20151. Sri Sushil Kr. DasS/o. Lt. Sudhir Kr. Das, Vill. & P.O. Khagrabari, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Cooch Behar-736179............Complainant(s)Versus1. The Superintendent, P...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2015
The Chief Superintentdent, Central Telegraph Office V/S Sri Kaushik Sarkar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Uttiya Saha Ms. Keka Chakraborty
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/687/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/05/2015 in Case No. CC/436/2014 of District Kolkata-II)1. Sri Kaushik SarkarS/o Late Harendra Chandra Sarkar, B/10, Bapuji Nag...
Case Number: 687
|
Date of Filing: 17-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2015
Chief Superintendent, Central Telegraph Office V/S Kaushik Sarkar
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II.8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/436/20141. Kaushik SarkarB/10, Bapuji Nagar Society, P.O. Regent Esate, P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata-700092............Complainant(s)Versus1. Chief Su...
Case Number: 436
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2015
Post and Telegraph Department V/S Tanba Morbaji Badwaik
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2004
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Telegraph in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Telegraph ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Telegraph under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.