
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 725 OF 2015Dhiraj Kumar Vs M/s Sony India Ltd. and Ors. BEFORE: HON’BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN PRESIDENT HON’BLE MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU MEMBER HON’BLE MRS. PRITI MALHOTRA MEMBER P...
Case Number: 725
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate K. Vinod Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamKottayamComplaint Case No. CC/201/20141. Jayesh KumarRaj Nivas Kanakkary Village Pattithanam P.O.KottayamKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India (P) LtdA-31, Mohan Co-Operative Industrial Estate Mathura Road New Delhi-110044Ne...
Case Number: 201
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2016
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
D.o.F:29/12/2016D.o.O:20/02/2016IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD CC.NO.326/16 Dated this, the 20th day of February 2016PRESENT:SMT.P.RAMADEVI : PRESIDENTSMT.BEENA K.G : MEMBERSMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL : MEMBERSandeep ,Rohini Nivas, : ComplainantRailway Gate,Kottac...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Sagar Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/269/2015Date of Institution:01/05/2015Date of Decision:29/01/2016M/s Chawla Publications (P) Ltd., SCO No.4-5, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh through its Director Bhagatjit Singh Chawla.&helli...
Case Number: 269
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2016
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate M G Tajimatrak
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur.Behind District Treasury Office, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/15/4341. Sadiq Allabaksh ShaikhSanjeev Gandhi Nagar Vijapur Road SolapurSolapurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt LtdHuma Gift and Mobile Sh...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sunil Kalra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:95 of 2015Date of Institution:23.02.2015Date of Decision:08.01.2016Amarinder Singh Gill s/o Mr.Harpal Singh Gill, Resident of House No.1629, Phase-VII, Mohali (Punjab). …..Complainant...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/469/2015Date of Institution:27/07/2015Date of Decision:07/01/2016Anju Walia w/o Sh. Pardeep Kumar, resident of H.No.1799, Sector 29-B, Chandigarh - 160030.…............Complai...
Case Number: 469
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-01-2016
Court Name: Sundargarh II
Appelant Advocate J .K Acharya
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSUNDARGARH-II, ROURKELAComplaint Case No. cc/21/20151. Chimaya Kumar RouthQtr No-D/807ector-8, , Rourkela, Sundargarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony india pvt ltdWhite park 119 ,2nd flower Kalakta2. Authorised SignatorySony Local S...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2016
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/219/20121. Manish GirhotraE-55 Ashok Vihar Phase-I Delhi-52...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Sony India Pvt Ltd A-31 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate New Delhi-44............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:...
Case Number: 219
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2016
Court Name: West Tripura
Appelant Advocate self
Respondant Advocate Mr.A.L.Saha, Mr.A.Saha.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSSAL FORUM WEST TRIPURA : AGARTALA CASE NO: CC- 19 of 2015Sri Subhas Bhattacharjee, Retd. Judicial Officer, Gr-1, Quarter No. IV/7, Judges Quarter Complex, Nazirpukur Par, Krishnanagar, Agartala, Tripura West. .............Complainant. ______V...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-01-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.