
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 14/06/2016ORDER Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of OP. Sh. R.P. Singh, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the execution application that he has received a cheque of Rs.49,921/- and withdraws the execution application. In view of the ...
Case Number: 52
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate Harsimranjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/16/1461. Shivam KapurLawrence Road, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Ltd.A-31, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, Mat...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-06-2016
Court Name: Jind
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vinod Bansal
Respondant Advocate Sh Pawanjit Saini
BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JIND. Complaint No. 78 of 2014 Date of Institution: 11.7.2014 Date of final order: 2.6.2016Dr. Mukul Garg c/o Maharaja aggarsain Hospital Scheme No.5 Gandhi Nagar, Jind. &hellip...
Case Number: 78
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2016
Court Name: Ajmer
Appelant Advocate ADV. JITENDRA GAUD
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/51/20151. ABHINIT CHAUDRYAJMER...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY INDIA PVT. LTDAJMER............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Vinay Kumar Goswami PRESIDENT Naveen Kumar MEMBER Jyoti Dosi MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERजि�...
Case Number: 51
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person Devinder Kumar,Adv
Respondant Advocate Vikrant Sharma,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:709/2015Date of Institution:14.12.2015Date of Decision:25/05/2016 Shahid r/o H.No.242/C, Daria now presently r/o H.No.642/C, Daria, Near Railway Station, UT, Chandigarh ... Complainant.Versus1. So...
Case Number: 709
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Ramesh Kumar Adv. & Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:673/2015Date of Institution:24.11.2015Date of Decision:24/05/2016 Mahavir Singh aged 41 years son of Sh.Phoolu Ram r/o H.No.1165-A, Sector 20-A, Chandigarh ... Complainant.VersusM/s Sony India Pr...
Case Number: 673
|
Date of Filing: 24-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2016
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate Dhiraj Parkh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOLHAPURCentral Administrative Building, Second Floor, South Side, Kasaba Bawada Road, Kolhapur.Phone No. (0231) 2651327, Fax No. (0231) 2651327.Complaint Case No. CC/16/641. Ashok Pruthviraj Parkh12/181,Behind Kongres Commity, Ichalkar...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 29-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2016
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/20/20161. Kuldeep singhs/o Krishan Gopal r/o Azad Nagar Gali No.3Bhiwani...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony IndiaIndustrial Estate Delhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Jindal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Ansuya Bishnoi MEMBER F...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Vikrant Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:67 of 2016Date of Institution:23.02.2016Date of Decision:16.05.2016Anju Walia w/o Sh. Pardeep Kumar, resident of H.No.1799, Sector 29-B, Chandigarh - 160030..…Appellant/Complainant.Versus(1) Sony India...
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2016
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Bhatia
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/15/4521. Bhupinder SinghPatti Behniwal, Sultanwind, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Ltd.A-31, Mohan Co-operative Indus...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.