
Court Name: West Tripura
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate None Appeared.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM WEST TRIPURA : AGARTALACASE NO: CC- 16 of 2017Sri Dipraj Debbarma, S/O- Sri Lalit Debbarma, Ujjan Abhoynagar, Near Puthiba Mandir, Agartala, West Tripura. ..…..…...Complainants. VERSUS 1. Sony India Private Ltd., A...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2017
Court Name: Ganjam
Appelant Advocate Mr. Satish Kumar Panigrahi, Mr. A.K.Singh, Mr. N.R.Patnaik, Mr. N.Haldar, Advocates.
Respondant Advocate Exparte
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GANJAM, BERHAMPURComplaint Case No. CC/43/20161. Bhairab Chandra BrahmaC/o. Eastern Media Times, Giri Road, Berhampur, Dist. Ganjam - 7600 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt. LtdA-31, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, M...
Case Number: 43
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/91/2017Date of Institution:31/01/2017Date of Decision:19/04/2017Dheeraj Kumar son of Sohan Lal, R/o MIG 1328/2, Ph-11, S.A.S. Nagar.……… Complainant.Versus1. Sony...
Case Number: 91
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/17/581. XAVIERERNAKULAM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY INDIAERNAKULAM............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. CHERIAN .K. KURIAKOSE PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUM...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-06-2017
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC No.745/16 D.O.O- 08.04.2017Present :- None.Complaint taken up in second National Lok Adalat held today on 08.04.17. In view of joint statement of Ms. Anjali Jain, complainant and Shri Shalabh Bhardwaj, advocate of the opposite party dated 05.04.17, the opposite party is dir...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2017
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092C.C. NO. 694/13Shri Suresh SharmaE-202, Nagarjuna ApartmentsMayur Vihar – INew Delhi – 110 096 ….ComplainantVs....
Case Number: 694
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Sunil K. Chindaliya
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH==========Consumer Complaint No:CC/230/2016Date of Institution:01/04/2016Date of Decision:03/04/2017Mandeep Singh son of Shri Bohar Singh, resident of House No.2815/B, Sector 42-C, Chandigarh.………&he...
Case Number: 230
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-04-2017
Court Name: Kanpur Nagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER FORUM KANPUR NAGARTREASURY COMPOUNDComplaint Case No. CC/466/20151. satpal singh2/20 I block govind nagarkanpur nagar UP...........Complainant(s)Versus1. sony indiaA -31 Mathura road new delhiNEW DELHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RN. SINGH PRESIDENTHON'BLE...
Case Number: 466
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate USHAKUMARI P
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL No.453/16JUDGMENT DATED:31.03.2017PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V JOSE : MEMBERMiss. Vishnu Maya,Money Vihar, Indira Nagar,Palakkad-678 013. : APPELLANT(By Adv: ...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikrant Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/69/2017(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/01/2017 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/853/2016 of District DF-II)1. Sony India Pvt. Ltd.chd...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sukesha Gusain chd...........Respondent(...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.