
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/135/2015InComplaint Case No. CC/362/20131. Rohit Mehta s/o Sh Parmod MehtaR/o S-65,Industrial Estate, ...........Appe...
Case Number: 135
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM II AGRACOLLECTORATE CAMPUS AGRAComplaint Case No. CC94/2014-I1. ANUPAM SIKDAR166 SAKET COLONY SHAHGANJ AGRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR SONY INDIA A-31 MOHAN COOPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE MATHURA ROAD NEW DELHI...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 17.01.2017First Appeal- 1115/2014(Arising out of the order dated 19.09.2014 passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi in Complaint Case No...
Case Number: 1115
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2017
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/524/20161. Sisir Kumar Saha (Shaw)9-B, Kashi Dutta Street, Kolkata-700006............Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt. Ltd. PS Arc...
Case Number: 524
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Court Name: North West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-V, (NORTH- WEST), CSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, NEW DELHI-110088Complaint Case No. CC/410/20141. VIJENDER BAHADURL-604.MUNGOL PURI,NEW DELHI-110083...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY INDIA PVT.LTD. CORP.A-31,MATHURA ROAD,MOHAN...
Case Number: 410
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MONIKA SRIVASTAVA
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 14.03.2017First Appeal-571/2016(Arising out of the order dated 07.09.2016 passed by the District Forum, Kashmere Gate, Delhi in complaint case No. 248/15) In the Matt...
Case Number: 571
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2017
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/13/6761. Chandan DattaSarat Sen Compound, Amdiha, PO,PS & Dist, Purulia, WB-723102.PuruliaWB...........Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VIKRANT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petition No. 104 of 2016Date of Institution: 21.11.2016Date of Decision: 03.01.20171. Sony India Pvt. Ltd., A-31, Mohan Cooperatives, Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, Delhi-110044.2. M/s Ultimate Services, ...
Case Number: 104
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/139/20161. Manoj Son of Ghanshyam vpo Old Anaj Mandi Bhiwani...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony IndiaJeenu Gift Shop Hansi Gate Bhiwani............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Jindal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Anamika Gupta MEMBER For...
Case Number: 139
|
Date of Filing: 08-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/1445/20141. Raghavendra. P.G.,S/o Gopal Chetty, No.278, Krishnan Palya, Bangalore-560 038. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager, Sony IndiaNo.768, 100 Feet Main Road, HAL 2nd Stage, 12th Main, Indiranagar, Bangalore-560 038.2. Manager, S...
Case Number: 1445
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.