company-name-logo

Puma

Latest Judgments

Total 627 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Neelam Aggarwal & anr.

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

Vakalatnama on behalf of the Judgment Debtors filed today, which is taken on record. It is stated by Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Advocate, Counsel for the Judgment Debtors at bar that Judgment Debtors No.2 & 3, namely, Sh. Anurag Bhargava impleaded as Chairman/Co-founder of Ireo F...

Case Number: 115

|

Date of Filing: 21-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 24-04-2017

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Bodh Raj Aggarwal

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

Vakalatnama on behalf of the Judgment Debtors filed today, which is taken on record. It is stated by Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Advocate, Counsel for the Judgment Debtors at bar that Judgment Debtors No.2 & 3, namely, Sh. Anurag Bhargava impleaded as Chairman/Co-founder of Ireo Fiveri...

Case Number: 116

|

Date of Filing: 21-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 24-04-2017

Chandigarh

Puma Realtoros Pvt.Ltd. V/S Mr. Jaspreet Singh

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Counsel for the applicants/complainants has filed an application for placing on record account statement as Annexure C-26. In view of prayer made, the application is allowed and the document aforesaid is taken on record. Office is directed to put the said documents at the ap...

Case Number: 427

|

Date of Filing: 06-04-2017

|

Date of Upload: 24-04-2017

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd, V/S VikramWadhwa

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate GauravBhardwaj

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:871 of 2016Date of Institution:30.11.2016Date of Decision:12.04.2017Vikram Wadhwa son of Sh.Prithvi Raj Wadhwa, resident of #3452, First Floor, Sector 71, Mohali, Punjab, at present Flat No.801, Tower...

Case Number: 871

|

Date of Filing: 30-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2017

NCDRC

HARDEEP KAUR & 2 ORS. V/S PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.

Puma  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. SK AGRAWAL & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. BHARAT SOOD

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1437 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 27/06/2016 in Complaint No. 09/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/1109/2017,IA/11049/2016,IA/11050/2016,IA/11051/20161. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.HAVING ITS ...

Case Number: 1437

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 18-04-2017

NCDRC

TIMPLE JAIN & 2 ORS. V/S PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.

Puma  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. SK AGRAWAL & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. BHARAT SOOD

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1437 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 27/06/2016 in Complaint No. 09/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/1109/2017,IA/11049/2016,IA/11050/2016,IA/11051/20161. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.HAVING ITS ...

Case Number: 1438

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 18-04-2017

NCDRC

SAMIR SINGH & ANR. V/S PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.

Puma  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. SK AGRAWAL & CO.

Respondant Advocate MS. NARENDER KAUR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1439 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 23/08/2016 in Complaint No. 208/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SAT...

Case Number: 1439

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 13-04-2017

Chandigarh

PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Mohinder Singh Bajaj

Puma   Bajaj  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti,Adv.

Respondant Advocate

After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for...

Case Number: 126

|

Date of Filing: 29-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 05-04-2017

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sunil Bhutani

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:72 of 2017Date of Institution:20.01.2017Date of Decision:31.03.2017Sunil Bhutani son of Sh.Mohinder Kumar Bhutani, House No.1225-9B, Vishnu Nagar, Jagadhari Workshop, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana.…&he...

Case Number: 72

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 31-03-2017

Chandigarh

PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Ashish Arora

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

The calculation made by the decree holder is not correct, as it is not in consonance with the decree passed. Faced with the situation, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Lib...

Case Number: 123

|

Date of Filing: 27-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-03-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.