Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 627 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shamsher Tandon
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harsh Tandon, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/270/2017InComplaint Case No. CC/641/20161. Shamsher TandonChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.Chandigarh...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbi...
Case Number: 270
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2017
PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Usha Rani
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:121 of 2017Date of Institution:09.02.2017Date of Decision:17.07.2017Usha Rani wife of Late Sh. Raj Kumar R/o H.No.1328, Sector 22-B, Chandigarh.……Complainant.VersusPuma Realtors Pvt. Ltd...
Case Number: 121
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2017
PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Usha Rani
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:122 of 2017Date of Institution:09.02.2017Date of Decision:17.07.2017Usha Rani wife of Late Sh. Raj Kumar R/o H.No.1328, Sector 22-B, Chandigarh.……Complainant.VersusPuma Realtors Pvt. Ltd...
Case Number: 122
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Mr.Deepak Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retai...
Case Number: 261
|
Date of Filing: 07-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Harpal Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Lakhbir Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER Counsel for the complainant states that the complainant has instructed him to say that the matter stands settled between the parties and on account of that, he wishes to withdraw this complaint. To the prayer made, no objection has been raised by the Counsel opposite. In v...
Case Number: 125
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2017
Kapsons Retail Pvt. Ltd., C/o Puma V/S Sukhwinder Singh Manchanda
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Ravi Inder Singh Adv. & Abhay Singh Gill Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:387 of 2017Date of Institution:16.11.2016Date of Decision:07.07.2017Sukhwinder Singh Manchanda s/o Sh.Gurdip Singh Manchanda r/o H.No.92, Sector 33-A, Chandigarh …..ComplainantVersusKapsons...
Case Number: 387
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2017
PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Dharam Raj Modgil
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:160 of 2017Date of Institution:20.02.2017Date of Decision:04.07.2017Mr. Dharam Raj Modgil s/o Late Sh. Ram Chand Modgil R/o House No.1220, Sector 7-B, Chandigarh.Mrs. Ram Rati Modgil w/o Sh. Dharam Ra...
Case Number: 160
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mrs. Kamini Puri
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S. M. Wadhera, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:190 of 2017Date of Institution:03.03.2017Date of Decision:30.06.2017Mrs. Kamini Puri W/o Sh.Vinod Kumar PuriPuneet Kumar Puri S/o Sh.Vinod Kumar PuriVinod Kumar Puri S/o Late Sh.Chaman Lal PuriAll res...
Case Number: 190
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-07-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Dinesh Seth
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikram Tandon, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 29/06/2017ORDER It is stated by Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Advocate, Counsel for judgment debtors No.1 to 4 assisted by Sh.Rajiv Bhatia, Legal Consultant that upto 07.02.2018 on the principal of diminishing balance an amount of Rs.92,19,054.40 is due for payment by the judgment deb...
Case Number: 171
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-07-2017
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Mohinder Singh Bajaj
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
This execution application has been filed by the decree holder/complainant to execute an order passed by this Commission in Consumer Complaint No.237 of 2016, decided on 19.09.2016. It is stated at the bar that half of the amount awarded was deposited before this Commission ...
Case Number: 152
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.