Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 627 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
M/s Puma Realtors Private Ltd. V/S Dr. Gurinder Singh Bholla
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sahil Khunder, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:645 of 2016Date of Institution:28.09.2016Date of Decision:09.03.2017Dr. Gurinder Singh Bholla s/o Manmohan Singh Bholla, H.No.3580, Tej Mohan Nagar, Jalandhar presently residing at 78 Chhoti Baradari ...
Case Number: 645
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2017
Puma Realtors V/S Rajinder Chaudhary
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harsh Garg, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:702 of 2016Date of Institution:17.10.2016Date of Decision:09.03.2017Rajinder Chaudhary son of Sh. Jagan Nath Chaudhary,Yogesh Chaudhary son of Sh. Rajinder Chaudhary,Rahul Chaudhary son of Sh. Rajinde...
Case Number: 702
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2017
M/s PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd, & anr. V/S Vinod Kumar & anr.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
It is stated by Counsel for the parties that the matter has amicably been settled. To discharge their liability, imposed on Judgment Debtors No.1 to 5 & 7 vide judgment dated 12.04.2016 passed by this Commission in Complaint Case No.246 of 2015, six post-dated cheques bearing...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Paramjit Kaur Sachar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
On the last date of hearing i.e. 03.03.2017, following order was passed:-“Vakalatnama alongwith copy of resolution filed on behalf of the Judgment Debtors, which is taken on record. Counsel for the parties handed over two cheques bearing No.008789 dated 02.03.2017 in the su...
Case Number: 161
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vikas Yadav
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
Vakalatnama alongwith copy of resolution filed on behalf of the Judgment Debtors, which is taken on record. Counsel for the parties state that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. To satisfy the judgment dated 26.04.2016 passed by this Commission, which was m...
Case Number: 41
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd & anr. V/S Smt. Amarjit Sandhu
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen K Kataria, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama alongwith copy of resolution filed on behalf of the Judgment Debtors, which is taken on record. Counsel for the parties state that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties and in response to the settlement in Court, three post-dated cheques bearing...
Case Number: 44
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Manpreet Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Devinder Singh Soundh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:490 of 2016Date of Institution:22.08.2016Date of Decision:02.03.2017Manpreet Singh son of S. Gurmeet Singh resident of Thanedar House New Model Town, VPO Sahnewal, Distt. Ludhiana, Punjab.2nd Address:...
Case Number: 490
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ramesh Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the decree holders that against the order under execution, the Opposite Parties/Judgment Debtors has gone in appeal, wherein, subject to deposit the amount, operation of the order has been stayed. In view of above, Counsel for the decree holders wishes...
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vishal Kataria
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the decree holder that against the order under execution, the Opposite Parties/Judgment Debtors has gone in appeal, wherein, subject to deposit the amount, operation of the order has been stayed. In view of above, Counsel for the decree holder wishes t...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Jawahar Lal Jindal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harsh Nagra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:322 of 2016Date of Institution:05.07.2016Date of Decision:20.02.2017Mr. Jawahar Lal Jindal, Aged 67 years S/o Late Sh. S. S. Jindal, Plot No.315, Industrial Area, Phase II, Panchkula (Hry.).…&h...
Case Number: 322
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.